From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-x22d.google.com (mail-qc0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D969621F1EA for ; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 14:45:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id i8so8359278qcq.18 for ; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 14:45:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kPDugIDukuhsSv7730ycenUW3e4PCijoExfpz5kevx4=; b=XXcAX6fRVz7ihRd39ccp8+7jOIEge300oNj0piXcjHggLn/L1lNuAx2tYiPjvVTQRY uFvfGy3+moCObm/lE/at52WNYw4z88NSY1jMZhCkbsmmUI4rDi4zjMPIHwMJb+oy+r1q wrilB+RZDWM/n+kUfQmy74Qh+pLAz+pFmtM8uQ+G1Guw4g6nRRy/VwvWzhDhT7+ounnw 0KOGgPG99Ured6oFzvrGdxB4imm/LrF0sbizIriHDOF+e5O8I+MS6yDnPBXVefyB/Bce r5wPnvTbqYQSRr+KTNQw6kuFqou2nLx6t5jHBhF+6Qeafutdpa0TDhj+0Xr3SsVY05qJ 3n1g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.115.78 with SMTP id h14mr34937878qaq.94.1391899509508; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 14:45:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.27.133 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Feb 2014 14:45:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87mwi18fl5.fsf@toke.dk> References: <87mwi18fl5.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 14:45:09 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland=2DJ=F8rgensen?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] WNDR alternative for higher capacity X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 22:45:11 -0000 On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Toke H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen w= rote: > So I've hit the capacity limit for the WNDR3800 for upstream bandwidth: > http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/karlstad/rrul-2014-02-08T195914.021= 795.cerowrt_3_10_26_fresh_boot_no_sqm.png > > This is without sqm enabled, even. When I plug in my laptop instead, I > get a smooth 100Mbps in both directions. So I'm now looking for > alternatives to act as router. Any suggestions? I'd prefer dual-band, What you are seeing mostly is the impact of the firewall rules. Without firewall rules I can get ~330Mbit. > dual radios; similar to what the WNDR has. And has to be able to run > OpenWRT, of course; in which case I'll try to get Cerowrt running on it. = :) > > One possibility is getting something like a zbox: > http://www.zotac.com/products/mini-pcs/zbox/product/zbox/detail/zbox-id91= -1.html > > Or a shuttle: > http://uk.shuttle.com/products/productsSpec?productId=3D1718 > > However those might be a bit overkill. Also I can't seem to find any > info on what wlan card they feature. Does anyone know? Probably a lousy one. > -Toke > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html