From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7737821F1AF for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ar20so4930999iec.7 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:13:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FwfVOvm8idnicGl6IjUhRpl1q8Oy2O9tq+oXwjqceuU=; b=drdqMI51cBr2U8jZW4Z4vo2A2S0FVb9z9wHUu3P3G/wTYi4iAn30IvdKppc/AnyYCW c2dj37v+c8e4pXQwDL7ZCCiyni+R1o7sHfjnhtvVaLXgsptA8fz3o9v1w2mGZihWTR0U VrYL1AdP72JN63A1sLCQSg2V0hnR3FhhJmmzAJs5/3Q4eUhMKMTFwYVzUfcLfJGI7rhJ LSRQ/TuQQ9YIXGu26TcTxepMmNH5oqLlzBh2z4YGzoIXLZI8ovLulmUE7lh//CCBeJhA 8HDgniu3IMXQbrnSg16HZiVi9xvLTRk/bc4pZXcF+9+TdwU0Rz/EqB6WMsjy5T74DjEG kB5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.134.136 with SMTP id pk8mr3240793igb.32.1371409983834; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.45.137 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:13:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8738shsx3w.fsf@toke.dk> References: <8738shsx3w.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:13:03 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland=2DJ=F8rgensen?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] trivial 6in4 fix(?) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:13:04 -0000 I don't think I pushed out the 6in4 patch into the build. Hell, I forgot to tag it too. Remind me to take a vacation next vacation? If these patches aren't in your build, it looks like we are indeed only using one class for fq_codel 6in4 traffic and thus are reverting to nearly pure codel behavior rather than fq_codel. I might be getting good at reading the patterns here - it looks like this is fq_codel rather than nfq_codel? # target/linux/generic/patches-3.8/677-flow_dissector-Add-6in4-suppor= t-to-hash-keys.patch # target/linux/generic/patches-3.8/678-Handle-encapsulated-ipv6-bette= r.patch # target/linux/generic/patches-3.8/678-remove-bad-timeout-logic-in-fa= st-recovery.patch as tc -s class show dev ge00 output during the test seems to show only one or = two tc classes in use. But a better test if you are using simplest.qos, rather than simplest.qos, would be the 4BE test. On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Toke H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen = wrote: > Dave Taht writes: > >> I am curious: Is there a current user of cero using simplest.qos, >> tunneling ipv6 via hurricane or 6to4, that can hammer it with multiple >> ipv6 streams (as in the rrul test)? (If you have rrul and ipv6, you >> can force it to do pure ipv6 testing with the -6 option.) > > Attaching a plot of rrul over ipv6 while running cerowrt-3.8.13-17 (or > my own build based on it that, is), and some output of tc -s class show > dev ge00 while the test was running. > > IPv4 pings stay flat at 45ms to the same host while the test is running. > > -Toke > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html