From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-il1-x12e.google.com (mail-il1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70F753B29D for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 20:29:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-il1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id r5so9210900ilq.6 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 17:29:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jaw2X/cec+JNCNX166mbAv/CNmJMZgNmOR0Y6spuhQQ=; b=A8Wi2X96ZZLGL6A32ZAzDPC2C8yUBp+Umt5LoSTtNA36D65D5rrkSEMJoFPx+BJzjM OQJzvBTR43QrXbQHjCritgpdT6jI4PmFvgUcdhP17NNfuu4bKWRlCM5HNm3dtJpggKbz rkizspt0UUhFnpOOFbCW/uEuJzdUwc6OybXrRfIx3cxALe9gzjQV5JX5f8Q1n5gYK3gg UQSVeJc/IWgcjI6JqbMXnwkwHy27BDHefFGWj6FANGdUhoPsRr3udEL4/QpWSOlBfv1m Yk15qjgqjk6TkL0gIb2rezw+2pX5HWFLpO3s2ku+ca9ArrY2z3bLsjY/KTJpomeQzHEB 7Urg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jaw2X/cec+JNCNX166mbAv/CNmJMZgNmOR0Y6spuhQQ=; b=f4m61daHAfOBinOHxEBy3pdxy10CbBhmMHTUOwk29rdyE4Q1bneUMh0KpEUuRmB3h/ kj2hPMDLkxSX+QN9zaJfyW3Az3XvDSO+GI9P4s0H2vf+CeWEb3OD9a/oEb5O+75mHbJQ bb9rsR0wM5k0rr/ioJdzd7o39G9znEHs/rbenut0a7m33mtLm3N9iHv++hRwtfVnpTq6 qyjXmToXlcJ5fC+pZ3gBqOT0gg7HbZa6Hsj6dfnqCwbjtrAGbG4IWP9abFDrvPzPS72S nn5HI4o6qzgmFsL05CusVUB8HUSZzz9P+gevZ90LkC/aSVYTjMgcURx9FMionHCfnpud yWlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pubk8tdwx76t1V7Gp5NZk/YG57rJV/fhwKTty+wRYv43d5n9QLEL 5OQuaYKaIueEcKrB66gb/ugtwuljjEdjQzNm9EA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL3egqnORpRjYUDNzfmdqy8xgaRqux4d1RAwyLz48MMlkVvEjG/DStGdEFZQWMSG4bI//9FgA/SnoyAgD3rAHg= X-Received: by 2002:a92:48d6:: with SMTP id j83mr11532082ilg.287.1585960151831; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 17:29:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1585954435.95276219@apps.rackspace.com> <253151.1585956770@turing-police> In-Reply-To: From: Dave Taht Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 17:28:59 -0700 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Joel_Wir=C4=81mu_Pauling?= Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Valdis_Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , cerowrt-devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] openwrt or "open" security cams? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 00:29:12 -0000 ya know, I am now mindblown by how little folk have paid attention to security in security cams. Stross's "scorpion stare" mod comes to mind. It's bad enough that "Cloud support" is sold as a "feature", merely being able to have some certainty the feed is going to my cloud or the camera is not a launch point for attacks within a network is kind of lacking in what I've perused thus far. I'd merely started with the thought that maybe I wanted ipv6 support, and that physical security is a problem in the first place for power and so on. I did find an outdoor camera with potential - battery backup, wifi, and solar support... https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07GBRV8W5/ref=3Dox_sc_act_title_2?smid= =3DA15NUCR7ITLOD6&psc=3D1 On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 4:36 PM Joel Wir=C4=81mu Pauling = wrote: > > Yeah - there is a full uboot replacement project (linked from that repo) = - so you can basically build openwrt for it. > > That project I linked too is more designed at end users who just want to = replace the userspace with somethat that isn't tied to xiaomi's cloud servi= ces. So is the best starting point. > > I didn't even bother looking at the firmware that comes with it; Serial u= art is exposed so I wouldn't worry too much about the users harping on abou= t not being able to install versions from newer factory firmwares ; serial = allows you to push whatever you like. > > On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 12:32, Valdis Kl=C4=93tnieks wrote: >> >> On Sat, 04 Apr 2020 12:08:48 +1300, Joel Wir=C4=81mu Pauling said: >> >> > The Xiaomi Dafang Cameras are good value and there is a completely ope= n >> > tool chain including uboot for them: >> >> Hopefully that security cam, having an open tool chain, isn't a security= -disaster >> cam like most of them are turning out to be (even the big-name ones from >> companies that *really* should know better...) > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Make Music, Not War Dave T=C3=A4ht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-435-0729