From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D83D21F308 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 19:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hi2so2799435wib.11 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 19:28:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=L+KmK2MgYwPtRZupNy6H1C8/7IAf3FXBv+jAVTJgKqI=; b=g1tSeUHT71wZXCm38uv7Di1zE4nx4QFSwUq5py6ULW/9ztiA3OpF5ZgvEh9xhqNxJt lUGBsFxTftVoVGkc2YkPQqS2PJ65lbmYs18549j/mzRTfg9NlY3sYqKf5f9lpwniAjIJ jxFRDzKDd/T4d4/3kNSo4id2fxTBzIwi5Dus3P/DoJ66RH/PnXlf69gfSgfjQXZQf1PM AeDC3toR1uqIlGTuGFWT/Vg1d3+HDEA2Alr6IbgTLLOIPOLFjKjhx3vabu0XtXlgE9+0 BDIf2dy4E7+c5olb5iTkEekX2jAZ6l3drvGLgscqvyrvaom36L/zOttT9Y0YkEzQ9Wox DFmg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.206.132 with SMTP id lo4mr44205257wic.46.1401244133149; Tue, 27 May 2014 19:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.207.82 with HTTP; Tue, 27 May 2014 19:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 19:28:53 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] SEO question X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 02:28:56 -0000 aaron got 47+s and 14 reshares on this... https://plus.google.com/+AaronWood77/posts/NsyV9z3RMvV which I think is more than I've ever got. Way to go aaron? Was it the comcast keyword? One of the things that frustrates me, is even after all this time, I don't see more than 56,000 refs to bufferbloat on google when I search for the term. "Qos" gets a lot more hits, aqm not so much. Maybe in order to crawl into people's conciousness more we need to mention qos more? other phrases when people think of lag? Long overdue is a couple more magazine articles, but we needz more science first. --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht