From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB08C21F2EF for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f44.google.com with SMTP id x69so57879oia.17 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:14:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/1ucefPM8snnz4zllKYSQKHsxLZ19yrKCeX8kbdpl6Y=; b=0mlUV93uvoIZKq51MzNy6t6JmY4lQ25MmWeXUMQICiTkgFHgVr3MjjeTBEYhHPeXTE eCFBVk1Gn6gxe/gBxRusJSfGevM7Kalvy7+j1LqM243EYGhtd32fodEDXbeS1zfDnr40 Cv+AG7MkhAomR3z/DdKHKqNLWdDGKg9ZD1YiYC17BWYvt3oWvQnnUSKGXFO7mhvnGsP4 tHyyOrKlfXhZTEasjZM71EO89bgnVybODwTApqGJ0FnskIJcBfofBXffo3b2er5yHLBR d2576ZwiBoLUTWB1ygkBlf1WbQqCSloDFHcK7PWNMLMewck0lVth5zpJr0z2lFRSdrlk +Ruw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.51.71 with SMTP id i7mr16288216oeo.41.1412806459384; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:14:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.227.76 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:14:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:14:19 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] wifi over narrow channels X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 22:14:52 -0000 https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/nsdi12/nsdi12-final142.pdf I've had 5mhz channels working in the ath9k at various points in cerowrt's lifetime. (using it for meshy stuff) After digesting most of the 802.11ac standard I do find myself wishing they'd gone towards narrower channels rather than wider. The netgear x4 defaults to a 160mhz wide channel. :sigh: The above paper has some nifty ideas in it. --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/make-wifi-fast