Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: William Katsak <wkatsak@gmail.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] better ingress shaping somehow
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 18:26:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4RwsCLjBJ9Jm5B40RLRc0HUDWDkyxk=PD=NuhkzHAaHg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <542DF493.80504@gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:57 PM, William Katsak <wkatsak@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you have a working x86 build for Cero again? Or just playing with a
> workstation?

No. I AM fiddling with the x86 build of openwrt, a bit. To me it seems easier to
port the sqm system to openwrt, and kill bridging, than go to the trouble
of porting cero...

I have several nuc boxes in the yurtlab that are used for load
testing, and recently
as part of the BQL rework, started building modern x86_64 kernels again.

A "plan", if I have it, is to try and clear my plate enough to make a
run at improving wifi.

Still buried from all the things I ignored for the last year...

There's an enormous backlog of bufferbloat.net work left to remedy, also.

Jonathon morton jumping in to write cake is a nice bonus, but unexpected.

>
> -Bill
>
>
>
> On 10/02/2014 07:07 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> Oh, no, that's an x86 result. It's barely a blip on that cpu use though,
>> so I am
>> encouraged so far. Haven't got around to porting it to mips, too many
>> non-working ideas elsewhere in it, ENOTIME.
>
>
> --
> ****************************************
> William Katsak <wkatsak@gmail.com>
> ****************************************
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel



-- 
Dave Täht

https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/make-wifi-fast

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-03  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-02 23:07 Dave Taht
2014-10-03  0:57 ` William Katsak
2014-10-03  1:26   ` Dave Taht [this message]
2014-10-03 18:02 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-05 16:26 ` Richard A. Smith
2014-10-05 17:57   ` Dave Taht
2014-10-06  2:16     ` Richard A. Smith
2014-10-06  2:37       ` Richard A. Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw4RwsCLjBJ9Jm5B40RLRc0HUDWDkyxk=PD=NuhkzHAaHg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=wkatsak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox