From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-x235.google.com (mail-qa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEC1E201299 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 18:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id v10so237587qac.12 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 18:26:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5w07zQ7RCEkCZUpkcL7jZAZD7HU2Ogl68RvxoPZl0GE=; b=SsEVilag/AVnYr5jP/w3dX4U/Io8rp0fIBegEahYx+Fkix3iczVctIT1AXkGmlGGJM GbfDeowbmaWDl5Y1cpDL50cA4/E4m15s4QsfY5TO7G4G1TSZ+rVUeGpPOtGTFCRs2Qfl 5iUEgeQGFG9FGnaege/7bkhS1SgK/Qkiqox3wS9bOw4CMojQg8oZbY6Uvcz5sBx7aOBo B3Lh6jxVAhMUyYwjs8De7xURO6MAyI8SKpIjQWvV/Tyl5RyQJr2O2JHqwqLgoGnqMO/4 ejmOXB2dSHxaVsRCOqXVm8hmo7k4FJelmNMuTgq5/WLgUNDm9YW0CF9XQyMbbrz37w+n NpSQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.19.36 with SMTP id 33mr1111678qgg.32.1412299604282; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 18:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.227.76 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 18:26:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <542DF493.80504@gmail.com> References: <542DF493.80504@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 18:26:44 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: William Katsak Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] better ingress shaping somehow X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 01:27:14 -0000 On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:57 PM, William Katsak wrote: > Do you have a working x86 build for Cero again? Or just playing with a > workstation? No. I AM fiddling with the x86 build of openwrt, a bit. To me it seems easi= er to port the sqm system to openwrt, and kill bridging, than go to the trouble of porting cero... I have several nuc boxes in the yurtlab that are used for load testing, and recently as part of the BQL rework, started building modern x86_64 kernels again. A "plan", if I have it, is to try and clear my plate enough to make a run at improving wifi. Still buried from all the things I ignored for the last year... There's an enormous backlog of bufferbloat.net work left to remedy, also. Jonathon morton jumping in to write cake is a nice bonus, but unexpected. > > -Bill > > > > On 10/02/2014 07:07 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> Oh, no, that's an x86 result. It's barely a blip on that cpu use though, >> so I am >> encouraged so far. Haven't got around to porting it to mips, too many >> non-working ideas elsewhere in it, ENOTIME. > > > -- > **************************************** > William Katsak > **************************************** > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/make-wifi-fast