Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt 3.8.8-4 released
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:55:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4VER2eQ_ak+SZQtGrBNbpmm-WZyA5Shehqq86mFy-MdA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

+ Refresh to openwrt barrier breaker head

   this now contains nearly all the patches formerly separately in cerowrt!

   ++ fq_codel is on by default on ALL interfaces with default quantum of 300
        (yes, openwrt has obsoleted pfifo_fast!)
   ++ unaligned access patches, etc, etc
   + dhcp-pd SERVER support
 the usual multitude of other openwrt fixes... all tested extensively
at the battlemesh conference.

+ Update to dnsmasq 2.67test2

Toke got really busy in building his own version of cero and adding

+ AQM scripts and gui
+ tahoe-lafs added (untested)
+ uftp4 updated

- no upnp/ssdp fix because I'm clueless

Yep, "AQM" gui now. /deep hat tip to toke for writing that. No need to
fiddle with any scripts now....

I guess of largest import here, underlying the gui, is that I had a
chance to deeply look at simple_qos.sh. There are several bugs in it,
that appear actually in the underlying tc subsystem.On ingress, the
priority queue was not being used properly, and a few other things
were odd in ipv6.

Out of frustration with that, and based on the data we'd got back from
cablelabs, I wrote the simplest possible rate limited fq_codel
implementation, using a reduced number of flows and a single tier of
htb only - and that works surprisingly well.

It's called "Simplest" in the new AQM screen. Give it a shot.

Secondly, the exercise of writing that and comparing it to the simple_qos script

.... seems to have exposed a bug in htb at low bandwidths.

http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/dsl384k-htb-bug.svg

Here I was trying at 384k up and 8Mbit down, and the middle portion of
the upload graph there is kind of... impossible. At higher rates I
haven't seen this happen.

-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html

             reply	other threads:[~2013-04-24  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-24  8:55 Dave Taht [this message]
2013-04-24  8:55 ` Dave Taht
2013-04-24 14:07 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2013-04-24 15:56   ` Dave Taht
2013-04-25  0:06     ` Rich Brown
2013-04-25  5:56       ` Dave Taht
2013-04-25 14:04         ` Maciej Soltysiak
2013-04-25  7:45       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2013-06-02 18:00 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2013-06-02 18:12   ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA93jw4VER2eQ_ak+SZQtGrBNbpmm-WZyA5Shehqq86mFy-MdA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox