From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt 3.8.8-4 released
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:55:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4VER2eQ_ak+SZQtGrBNbpmm-WZyA5Shehqq86mFy-MdA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
+ Refresh to openwrt barrier breaker head
this now contains nearly all the patches formerly separately in cerowrt!
++ fq_codel is on by default on ALL interfaces with default quantum of 300
(yes, openwrt has obsoleted pfifo_fast!)
++ unaligned access patches, etc, etc
+ dhcp-pd SERVER support
the usual multitude of other openwrt fixes... all tested extensively
at the battlemesh conference.
+ Update to dnsmasq 2.67test2
Toke got really busy in building his own version of cero and adding
+ AQM scripts and gui
+ tahoe-lafs added (untested)
+ uftp4 updated
- no upnp/ssdp fix because I'm clueless
Yep, "AQM" gui now. /deep hat tip to toke for writing that. No need to
fiddle with any scripts now....
I guess of largest import here, underlying the gui, is that I had a
chance to deeply look at simple_qos.sh. There are several bugs in it,
that appear actually in the underlying tc subsystem.On ingress, the
priority queue was not being used properly, and a few other things
were odd in ipv6.
Out of frustration with that, and based on the data we'd got back from
cablelabs, I wrote the simplest possible rate limited fq_codel
implementation, using a reduced number of flows and a single tier of
htb only - and that works surprisingly well.
It's called "Simplest" in the new AQM screen. Give it a shot.
Secondly, the exercise of writing that and comparing it to the simple_qos script
.... seems to have exposed a bug in htb at low bandwidths.
http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/dsl384k-htb-bug.svg
Here I was trying at 384k up and 8Mbit down, and the middle portion of
the upload graph there is kind of... impossible. At higher rates I
haven't seen this happen.
--
Dave Täht
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-24 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 8:55 Dave Taht [this message]
2013-04-24 8:55 ` Dave Taht
2013-04-24 14:07 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2013-04-24 15:56 ` Dave Taht
2013-04-25 0:06 ` Rich Brown
2013-04-25 5:56 ` Dave Taht
2013-04-25 14:04 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2013-04-25 7:45 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2013-06-02 18:00 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2013-06-02 18:12 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw4VER2eQ_ak+SZQtGrBNbpmm-WZyA5Shehqq86mFy-MdA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox