From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED7B2012F7 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 10:29:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so2773986wib.10 for ; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:29:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gjt+bOLBcdHH01PTPyKk04NzukUYBw9SI/nNAkRm9co=; b=jwLddoHxZcdywzcPqj2pmGDwN/t6dEm71cIDbLqnlGRUE7TtClt3gv6Oo8Ib71oMZy SNZnHBdwItX637up56oKr5kAXTCsjx/G3efPNiji6zpDuk0BHRRn7WCUGNXlyFlSzTJA 04HiOlxIiWOGtMBsd/KxzGZaalMT/oXlGlPM4TRszcZPevaE0HZAJtbf4kU4VSCxHsW3 ESFKi6im8T65h+RotHSIetbmCip5SXmGG1DRMU2Um5FUhQieH7ETCoX6nrgh0PgfIXt4 TxXiBKIdCGsA3WCqS/BnJqrBcf56psIc75bDRJJjWw0okuS5ks4w42uNHAQsYNS4R5qs ng/Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.198.14 with SMTP id u14mr2225474wen.12.1341250192923; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.103.199 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 10:29:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:29:52 -0400 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Maciej Soltysiak Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] WNDR6300 - 802.11ac device - any good? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:29:55 -0000 On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Maciej Soltysiak wro= te: > Hi, > > Netgear has recently released a 802.11ac device dubbed WNDR6300 with 128 = MB > Flash and 128 MB RAM. > Not sure what chip it has, probably BCM4360. > > Anybody knows if this is as open as WNDR3800 to allow cerowrt and open th= e > door for even more problem with gigabit wireless? ;-) > > Regards, > Maciej I would ask the openwrt list this question. But I doubt that it's presently very open to radical developments. It would be very nice if the 6300 was usable in various ways (does it at least have apps?) - I'd like to get bufferbloat related fixes in by default on the 802.11ac stack, as one major example - and oooh! 128MB flash. LUXURY. I personally am not in a position to do any more work on cerowrt than I currently do; it's a full time job that doesn't pay anything at all. And then I have two other full time volunteer jobs. Adding direct support for more cerowrt hardware on that budget is just not in the cards... (I do try to focus high enough on the stack to get fixes out for linux mainline and openwrt that apply across everything, however. I'm very happy with how fast fq_codel is propagating) Although the karmic rewards of these volunteer jobs (fixing the internet, working with you all) are often quite satisfying, I'm 8 months past the point where I need to find some work that puts food on the table, even if not so karmically rewarding. As much as I like living in a yurt, I kind of need a car to survive in the US as one problem I'm dealing with now. Last week I came very close to moving back to Nicaragua in time for debconf, (a horse is 200 bucks!) but I feel I'm more effective in the valley (the nearest radio shack is 6km, rather than 100km, away), and have found a good site for future experimentation, so I hope to find a way to continue in the US for the rest of the year. Somehow. On something. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --=20 Dave T=E4ht http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki - "3.3.8-6 is out with fq_codel!"