From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC0EB3B4A4; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 22:17:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id k142so64223081oib.1; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:17:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GuAxk6tX0Hx6Tm5v4GOYuUe7LgaCN8QAC9e8+7mD3Ok=; b=sIXRfUxWZPmV09tzB7tPvc3J4GvfCN5wNfPqMIMbQcoP+3b7n5A/wOgRTdFRMPnm6T o/n7jDf4ETRuV66v9hMCMEnJfzfUcss4xmjtCokJSHwIEL2MFJG16Hsoq2Neu4zg8enj M2LISzOCTElZVuNbd07ZsW6Pq/mYDD93SF3Y/UlsXEN6js1ZEtuxs9bm+UMJXo3o0KqR B1fAGUKZ9GSuMnHU8F4xihUzIAEdJeWXTYdn8DBXWGFXFxp40K54TKOT/LTeEK8/XdZ1 elj4j62ZqYXTMhtfBzf4xVP3VkdGjEYy7895fOJOkfTLHYG+b1DXjUmaHl7I6Cl15Xj5 TjPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GuAxk6tX0Hx6Tm5v4GOYuUe7LgaCN8QAC9e8+7mD3Ok=; b=IZsKozHzrQ1vaQ+4Naql2p1SkZfHaJGa/mFz8lsyBbWd+af5Nd2pKzk4eERKtZOrgr uUXToobu4aARYCSIwpuwDEapa28EtOZEKog6Bz2k8wDXeK+x4Y2vogUf8Bo9NJi92WYC jKbj4tHsxix3AyAgR3u4OiNBEJIRtJxE8e1qcwgf5D5R6xKsXXpRdgYAZW0RUnUdfBOE DIoi8VtyOgOylEOjXgvseOqN5eWrDO5p832MBL9iT7pGxmH2UZAJsWtmCvTQ2Hy+INON TURcbJB5651BPvwUcHM/fesSKD6z93xJMLbE+v0vjc2eBDXCRH+PGMH8hYH0InvlI76b yAmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWgaeUsHCGOK61YW5UoiahhPYYimU1QPc75Gt6e1446H6vXMGJbFCA6xrzF5kURLRUVLDApx9/vabfNQw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.178.135 with SMTP id b129mr4886297oif.139.1461205077228; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.79.194 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:17:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <13261.1461203888@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <9146.1461194647@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <13261.1461203888@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:17:57 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Valdis Kletnieks Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , cake@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] OK, what's the current recommendation(s)? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:17:58 -0000 I have been using the following "advanced" openwrt build, which includes a slightly older version of cake at the moment (I just reflashed the linksys 1200ac I have with the latest) https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=3D50914 sigh: the latest tc-adv, and cake need to get pushed up into it. It also has some advanced features that are "intersting" like tor support and it uses dnscrypt by default.... has babeld 1.7.1, hnetd, etc available, for the brave. I will do some benchmarks later today. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:58 PM, wrote: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:48:51 -0700, Dave Taht said: > >> Can't recommend anything at $100 at the moment. The linksys 1200ac >> comes closest. I have one running on a 125/25 connection using cake >> just fine - but I can still pretty easily crash it on the wifi as of >> openwrt trunk from a month back. The wifi is great while it lasts >> tho.... > > Thanks for the pointer, poked around on Amazon and the OpenWRT site, the = 1200AC > looks like a workable choice feature-wise and for my bank account. Will > probably go with that. > > Will probably flash the 3800 with openwrt 15.05 and benchmark it a bit be= fore > I replace it... > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org