From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E267421F0B0 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:50:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id tq11so4226110ieb.0 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:50:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nsbrflA3eb98ml2BldyxCVW65ZePUtV6gcmMsWhyGB0=; b=KwLwcv3dtEviqNIsvOVBYC6Lzar/Xqmn9NKHU5E/18Pa/97+Fg4iuNW3Q8yqkGyynn AoswHfjKIr/lVXhK1/D3e2kb6m2bf67wzcAgB+y5K0ChcBTS1XK93qfKSHGHcDTbL5Uy Fh8J/rS5TcVM945tRBjaCkRv7RR9zihrYE/y269O/zLfAWpy10NxhwfrSca0/KPV5Fqd CkXhpk38wV1J800r/ZrSI/P3Ybekbj1rFecPsKd73VWdQfAZu9aT+IW3Go/zT/rUsq8I IIWco6deQGNkoFKib3D1IKwS9RiGQbRsYI5avjluzlAq7OlC3rAEEK801CjMjb/LDRs4 lKsQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.0.202 with SMTP id nn10mr862890icb.54.1390668625128; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:50:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.145.67 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:50:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 11:50:25 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland=2DJ=F8rgensen?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] procd support for core daemons? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:50:26 -0000 On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Toke H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen = wrote: >> Left to convert are babeld (which was the only one of the above I >> really cared about, sadly. I am bogged down on understanding the >> uci_validate routine). > > I mostly care about babeld and tincd. Will look into those when I get a c= hance, unless you beat me to it... Well, when I get back to california I have ipv6 capability again so I'll add tincd to my testlist of the vpn technologies that may be problematic with source/dst routing... but I'm done through monday at least. gotta pack. >> >> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/procd > > That page is useless... like all wikis it can be improved. I left a bunch of documentation behind in the babeld attempt on how the validator theoretically works. > > -Toke > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html