From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.44-5 released
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 19:15:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4e0fgbEMtpcvrzM2A96MfgnWBCAXLE3zQ__vMTuigd4A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6jmWssdQ-NJqpN6gU0mztggpknsyu4X8N2pRjpUVC4xA@mail.gmail.com>
sigh. I gotta admit that an install was not encouraging for basic
functionality. My *principal* need for doing a new build is to keep
trying to find and fix bug 442. That's it. All the other stuff
changing out underneath is a distraction.
I really need to find more time to integrate new stuff and test than I
have at the moment. A ton of things are landing in openwrt mainline
done slightly differently to how cero does them.
0) yes, it does basically "work"
1) it looks like the ntp monitoring thing toke did is not working
and/or we're running the wrong ntp now
but dnsmasq does not run with timechecks enabled by default, so we
work with invalid time
it does look like two versions are running, too...
2) mdnsd got enabled again (my fault, I guess) and conflicts with avahi
3) the new version of miniupnpd is doing new and unusual things like
listening on port 5000...
4) it's firing off netserver all of a sudden by default instead of out
of xinetd, where it is firewalled
All these bugs are survivable (disable mdnsd, firewall off port 5000,
delete /etc/init.d/netserver) but I'm going to cut another release
tomorrow anyway. I don't know what's going on on the miniupnpd front:
Wed Jun 25 01:55:40 2014 daemon.notice miniupnpd[2706]: shutting down MiniUPnPd
Wed Jun 25 01:55:41 2014 daemon.notice miniupnpd[2909]: HTTP listening
on port 5000
Wed Jun 25 01:55:41 2014 daemon.notice miniupnpd[2909]: HTTP IPv6
address given to control points :
[2001:470:8236:261:2ac6:8eff:febb:9ff1]
Wed Jun 25 01:55:41 2014 daemon.err miniupnpd[2909]:
OpenAndConfNATPMPSocket: bind(): Address already in use
Wed Jun 25 01:55:41 2014 daemon.err miniupnpd[2909]: Failed to open
sockets for NAT-PMP/PCP.
Wed Jun 25 01:55:47 2014 daemon.notice miniupnpd[2909]: shutting down MiniUPnPd
Wed Jun 25 01:55:48 2014 daemon.notice miniupnpd[3415]: HTTP listening
on port 5000
Wed Jun 25 01:55:48 2014 daemon.notice miniupnpd[3415]: HTTP IPv6
address given to control points :
[2001:470:8236:261:2ac6:8eff:febb:9ff1]
Wed Jun 25 01:55:48 2014 daemon.err miniupnpd[3415]:
OpenAndConfNATPMPSocket: bind(): Address already in use
Wed Jun 25 01:55:48 2014 daemon.err miniupnpd[3415]: Failed to open
sockets for NAT-PMP/PCP.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> + resync with openwrt head
> updates to iw, mac80211
> various routing table fixes in netifd
>
> + dnsmasq 2.71 with mini-gmp and libnettle mainlined
> also moved into procd for better automagic restart
> (this leaves babel as the only major daemon not managed by procd. sigh)
>
> - totally untested (I tested -4 pretty thoroughly though)
> I won't have time for this personally til later this week.
> - still no answer for bug 442 - I do get bad things to happen on a
> ubnt device now
> - left off on the homewrt integration for now
>
> I need to get around to submitting sqm upstream again, but am busy on
> other tasks.
> IETF is coming up, also.
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article
--
Dave Täht
NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-25 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-24 22:33 Dave Taht
2014-06-24 23:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-06-24 23:37 ` Dave Taht
2014-06-25 2:15 ` Dave Taht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw4e0fgbEMtpcvrzM2A96MfgnWBCAXLE3zQ__vMTuigd4A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox