From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f169.google.com (mail-ie0-f169.google.com [209.85.223.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12EAD21F11C for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:31:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c14so19110453ieb.28 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:31:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+f2bXN/q0woP3FHHTybOv9aZbmy1ohHuDJtf8Jr4qTA=; b=Rh8BNF0NUiuJ10SJ8SdVx8bg/U2DoMi2JbngX2Myzc1wzaY7qio6Jb7EFuVdhFBwYD RWFdWb7wdNTqai91fxZShiGDgC6ovMwLztUNRLgU974nZVQ7HBtisOXfYnpNda9Rioz8 gCEajp4g3JsiGYux2YOgkBLEP2aaEkDpNKB3W8M6ahh9Bj36O8Le/t3YgwxBbJ2r9WLM pVC/EtJxd4+TD6ay9puri8AzQV5sVDod3VnRzerp0UND6gSIevBJC/zxBLDechlQ3WOL K5hTBXgNPWTJ8OXdXMTlfCoowr2J8lZGI3c3dJK2i5cGwyYPKac2sK7xPXRJ4AvA33ZH Z2xw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.196.164 with SMTP id in4mr37101795igc.86.1357245094497; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:31:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.135.39 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:31:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:31:34 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] breaking off a port off the vlan correctly? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:31:35 -0000 One of the things I've long ignored, despite the popularity of it, is vlan stuff. I care, like everything else, it's just not currently a high priority for me to deal with high rate vlan traffic. But: I just had a need to connect two entirely separate networks together. Being me I just slammed a routed dreamplug between the two lans (which just worked five minutes after I compiled babeld and turned off getting default gateways from dhcp), but it seems saner to just remap one of the ports on a wndr3800 to be its own ethernet device (and keep hacking BQL onto the dreamplug, which is what I have it for) current config: default gw box <-> cerowrt <-> dreamplug <-> other network desired config: default gw box <-> cerowrt <-> dedicated port <-> other network However, in trying to do that, several ways, I made bricks. Wrong way #1: turn on vlan support, create an untagged vlan #2 on port #3 from the switch, disable port #3 from vlan 1, create an interface for it (I did all this via the gui), rebooted... The box stopped serving dhcp entirely. IPv4 stopped too. I did see ipv6 traffic... Left off vlan support, never saw any traffic on the broken out port, dhcp stopped working on ethernet entirely but stayed up on wifi... I tried various combinations of using se00.1 and se00.2 to similar non-effect... Sigh. In reading up on this on openwrt's web site I'm even more confused than i was before. I seem to recall that other parties have tried this and went through hell, too... Anybody got this to work? Secondly: My assumption is that you run fq_codel on the underlying interface, not the vlan, am I correct in this? --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html