From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76226201253 for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 15:25:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n12so6782269wgh.2 for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 15:25:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lVYDyL1cAZZh0+9/H5P6EcxuaMMR2JwdKDR+cL9k8PE=; b=E9Jdf1Hm75Rs6s2hUZCqFkSG12VzcfhZD3xrFxa2nQ44SBUp9yjdq8flLQhA2fwocz DzCzC/pnJbI5Ks1GJZ9ij+DeZGzC9HI0m2u8+Ryvo4KCif5Rw7/EBWk/xCj0N8E92QcR oJbQhQeJoYATzprKmt9T0kIihXgZxy5xgSiH8JA31oOQmEU1vu6ZW+WRNqJ99gqS1Awb 3/etMpLUMmcGyCH+Ua39Qzv8VULV/TSwm+9vSBQQXh/qBTUedGsIeSn6n0LLJjMcnM0t 1Suu3rkM5YlWdcw/2k5uhlTpxfxfGifedvRoL1SWoA4Po7Tdk4VwOg8ui9LQBOArXWFr +WHw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.90.230 with SMTP id bz6mr23625053wib.17.1388013924102; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 15:25:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.123.69 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 15:25:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.123.69 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 15:25:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <878uv85yau.fsf@toke.dk> References: <878uv85yau.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 15:25:24 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland=2DJ=F8rgensen?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043be008e3b82204ee642c3a Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Testing 3.10.24-8 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 23:25:27 -0000 --f46d043be008e3b82204ee642c3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is there an unshaped version in there for reference? On Dec 25, 2013 3:02 PM, "Toke H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen" wrote: > Flashed 3.10.24-8 and ran a bunch of tests against it on my VDSL line. > All the data is here: > > http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/cerowrt-3.10.24-8/ > > which documents my tests of several different speed settings for the SQM > scripts. Ended up sticking with 46000/9800 Kbit/s corresponding to these > plots: > > > http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/cerowrt-3.10.24-8/rrul-2013-12-25T2= 32954.622558.3_10_24_8_46000_9800_ethernet_overhead_0_simplest_.json.gz_all= _scaled.svg > > http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/cerowrt-3.10.24-8/rrul-2013-12-25T2= 32954.622558.3_10_24_8_46000_9800_ethernet_overhead_0_simplest_.json.gz_pin= g_cdf.svg > > http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/cerowrt-3.10.24-8/rrul-2013-12-25T2= 32954.622558.3_10_24_8_46000_9800_ethernet_overhead_0_simplest_.json.gz_tot= als.svg > > I ran some tests over wifi, which mostly just show that my laptop's wifi > chipset sucks. Didn't manage to get any TX dma errors, though. > > > Oh, and I got rid of the fixdaemons script in my own build and haven't > had any trouble getting dnsmasq to come up, nor have I seen other averse > effects. > > Also, I fixed the sysupgrade script and pushed the change to git, so > next time Dave spins a build, it should be included. :) > > -Toke > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > --f46d043be008e3b82204ee642c3a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Is=A0 there an unshaped version in there for reference?

On Dec 25, 2013 3:02 PM, "Toke H=F8iland-J= =F8rgensen" <toke@toke.dk> w= rote:
Flashed 3.10.24-8 and ran a bunch of tests against it on my VDSL line.
All the data is here:

http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/cerowrt-3.10.24-8/
which documents my tests of several different speed settings for the SQM scripts. Ended up sticking with 46000/9800 Kbit/s corresponding to these plots:

http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/da= ta/cerowrt-3.10.24-8/rrul-2013-12-25T232954.622558.3_10_24_8_46000_9800_eth= ernet_overhead_0_simplest_.json.gz_all_scaled.svg
http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data= /cerowrt-3.10.24-8/rrul-2013-12-25T232954.622558.3_10_24_8_46000_9800_ether= net_overhead_0_simplest_.json.gz_ping_cdf.svg
http://files.toke.dk/bufferbloat/data/c= erowrt-3.10.24-8/rrul-2013-12-25T232954.622558.3_10_24_8_46000_9800_etherne= t_overhead_0_simplest_.json.gz_totals.svg

I ran some tests over wifi, which mostly just show that my laptop's wif= i
chipset sucks. Didn't manage to get any TX dma errors, though.


Oh, and I got rid of the fixdaemons script in my own build and haven't<= br> had any trouble getting dnsmasq to come up, nor have I seen other averse effects.

Also, I fixed the sysupgrade script and pushed the change to git, so
next time Dave spins a build, it should be included. :)

-Toke

_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

--f46d043be008e3b82204ee642c3a--