From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAAE4201253 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 09:31:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m15so13529434wgh.13 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 09:31:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wIlhYIpi0ytIlCHXbEM/lEeGD2N+Gnj9sB8mVS9/LsE=; b=L0+n0zoxl4XcPKi5A5V4quMjf5N3dbbokO0YCC0UmAy1007bM0bvfXMbGpaGMGpk7P Zf5a/uuxXYOobYgFLIb5SV/ZJy+SGBXCB3lOEAU4vYX2RdrtLcx+d0nnO5YnytlZ4q9o 88Qlib8CXIFTvaVMOafcZGp3zhdImpkiIfCQp9v13hrEnlX7szPsoQtBOUvDM1d6/9Hp z4sB86V0V51WNZdl8/tKGn7HFy/sqAK2x1GCAL2BOvwn4pgMn/QKjwT/OEnUsVIRs3gx FkRqLMg2zHVAZdPQyXG7BDYj+JAxqpgs7HOS3fHWuNMw3SPrKLjuLA3Y0sryh1XD2zXU 7AcQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.105.199 with SMTP id go7mr2665002wib.53.1388770265523; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 09:31:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.123.69 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 09:31:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:31:05 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "cb.list6" , Matt Mathis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "Steven B." , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 6relayd X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 17:31:48 -0000 On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 11:50 AM, cb.list6 wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> At one level I am happy to figure out this is a recently introduced bug. >> >> On the other hand I am not sure if it is 6relayd. >> >> What version of cero was working for you? > > > I am not entirely sure, but i think it was from September. > > CB At the moment I lack the ability to debug the breakage in ipv6 dhcp-pd (which is odhcpd) (I am travelling). I will on my next stop next week (tuesday) setup a dhcpv6pd server and see what I can see. > >> >> On Jan 3, 2014 12:21 AM, "cb.list6" wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have been using CeroWRT on Comcast with a 3800 for about 6 month. Th= e >>> DHCP-PD config has always been a little unstable for me, but working. >>> >>> I recently upgraded to: >>> >>> root@cerowrt:/etc/config# uname -a >>> Linux cerowrt 3.10.24 #1 Tue Dec 24 10:50:15 PST 2013 mips GNU/Linux >>> >>> My WAN gets a /128, but i cannot get DHCP-PD to work to get addresses o= n >>> the rest of my interfaces. The router does seem to have good IPv6 acce= ss. >>> >>> >>> I fiddled with the 6relayd config and came up with this, but it does no= t >>> work. Any pointers on how to get this back on track? The result of th= e >>> below config is that the /128 from the WAN interfaces is now present on= all >>> the interfaces but my attached computers get no addresses. >>> >>> >>> config server 'default' >>> option rd 'server' >>> option dhcpv6 'server' >>> option management_level '1' >>> list network 'ge01' >>> list network 'gw00' >>> list network 'gw01' >>> list network 'gw10' >>> list network 'gw11' >>> list network 'se00' >>> list network 'sw00' >>> list network 'sw10' >>> option fallback_relay 'rd dhcpv6 ndp' >>> option master 'ge00' >>> >>> root@cerowrt:/etc/config# uname -a >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >>> > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html