From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F10A21F1B8 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 16so5193353iea.17 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:21:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Qp1HXnisjLMOybRqUQ/zzuHP94HTVRdTWrtSdazFhY=; b=rhnMzfVdBQsW+zC0HHVSUbAPl/xJ+0Tjf1uWiu6wCNV+ixQLtxyWwhclEgkOUW7NL+ qq7cR+x//1wn7uXuJQU+nZViIs4XxttUHVMOQQbKY+RZ6gCohopReyoBpgY2xSmTU++v UTFI4Czi3gOZdiX2a/c79nd/ZASNNLofi4T/2j4HvloceKf51Vppn3KpyQYVLWOWlMTP dzizel97I61t7yWpRRK6qtZTiBAE0WWTeVVgl7uoCiVus3P5P9kImZhYsIc8w/Wlg18H DSaOYP6wbABMkC+FsnOqueZ6PaHHUI3q2TNq6flECjd2MRnGPwT8sN5Nb0T+E7uWuIMu k31w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.72.49 with SMTP id a17mr3239974igv.36.1371410509480; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:21:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.45.137 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:21:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8738shsx3w.fsf@toke.dk> References: <8738shsx3w.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:21:49 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland=2DJ=F8rgensen?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] trivial 6in4 fix(?) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:21:50 -0000 You have this huge latency spike late in your test... (?) On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Toke H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen = wrote: > Dave Taht writes: > >> I am curious: Is there a current user of cero using simplest.qos, >> tunneling ipv6 via hurricane or 6to4, that can hammer it with multiple >> ipv6 streams (as in the rrul test)? (If you have rrul and ipv6, you >> can force it to do pure ipv6 testing with the -6 option.) > > Attaching a plot of rrul over ipv6 while running cerowrt-3.8.13-17 (or > my own build based on it that, is), and some output of tc -s class show > dev ge00 while the test was running. > > IPv4 pings stay flat at 45ms to the same host while the test is running. > > -Toke > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html