From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.10-1 development build released
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:14:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4n=VU2uHnYr+1z2vwUgyPMyc00zRVHJKdntqiq7iC3Xw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4M=NqHRo8J7ned79vU9wyLLttn-OG9ifpSrAGmzBi3OA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1808 bytes --]
I did manage to test 3.10.10-1 briefly. It worked. I note that configuring
ipv6 properly is still up in the air vs 6relayd or dnsmasq.
Based on that working, I did the very minor upgrade to build 3.10.11-2 (I
goofed the first time, thus no -1)
http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.11-2/
Please feel free to give this a shot as a devbuild instead of 3.10.10
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> + readlink fix (hopefully fixes sysupgrade)
> + usual merge with openwrt head (tons of ath9k changes)
> + dnsmasq 2.67test10
> + ipv6subtrees back in
> + the final htb atm patches
> + eliminated maxpacket check in codel
>
> - did not fold in edumazet's new fq code
> - 100% totally untested. May a braver soul than I give it a shot. I won't
> be near a cero box til thursday, otherwise.
>
> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.10-1/
>
> -I'm not sure if I got the "last" of the aqm gui patches in there or not...
>
> ...
>
> Anyway... I had hopes to get a stable release out in august. I AM very
> happy about the major stuff that got fixed, instead... but...
>
> Since we didn't... I now have a ton of other matters piled up. Not least
> of which is a pending trip to england and the eu.
>
> So for the next month I don't see how I'm going to be able to put more
> than a day a week into cerowrt. Tops. So I have tagged up this "release"
> and pushed all the baked portions of the sources to github. I'm still a
> little dubious of the ipv6 subtrees bit....
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
>
--
Dave Täht
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2806 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-10 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-10 0:28 Dave Taht
2013-09-10 5:14 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2013-09-10 9:45 ` Fred Stratton
2013-09-10 10:07 ` Fred Stratton
2013-09-12 0:16 ` Dave Taht
2013-09-12 4:27 ` Fred Stratton
2013-09-12 15:49 ` Fred Stratton
2013-09-12 15:55 ` Fred Stratton
2013-09-12 16:31 ` Fred Stratton
2013-09-12 16:41 ` Fred Stratton
2013-09-11 8:36 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-09-12 4:10 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA93jw4n=VU2uHnYr+1z2vwUgyPMyc00zRVHJKdntqiq7iC3Xw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox