Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "Török Edwin" <edwin@etorok.net>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.32-9 released
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:03:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4nKeQ+rUQ5dg8gLReNzoEVhu9C6d7M4t0tUK8CvfHriA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53287917.5020503@etorok.net>

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Török Edwin <edwin@etorok.net> wrote:
> On 03/18/2014 05:35 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Török Edwin <edwin@etorok.net> wrote:
>>> Should I also run a rrul46/rrul46compete test?
>>
>> If you can test ipv6 too, that would be great.
>
> Attached IPv6 results.

The behavior I find puzzling is how rapidly you lose your measurement
flows, basically immediately after you hit slow start on the test, packet
loss there occurs and they all die.

My guess is you actually have insufficient buffering on the gpon or onc sides,
which also explains your low latency.

>>
>> At 8ms of induced extra latency without SQM there doesn't seem to be
>> much point in running it on your platform. It does look like you are tail
>> dropping...
>>
>> A thought would be to leave it
>> off and try running your link at 100Mbit rather than gige.
>>
>> # ethtool -s ge00 advertise 0x008
>
> Well ge00 already runs at 100Mbit, because ISP plugged me into a 100Mbit port on the switch:
>         Advertised link modes:  10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
>                                 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
>                                 1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full
>         Advertised pause frame use: No
>         Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
>         Speed: 100Mb/s

Ah.

> They would plug me into a 1Gbit port only if I pay for 1Gbps connectivity, which is in fact only 7 EUR/month more, but its not available in my area yet :)
>
>>
>> and see if fq_codel alone can break up bursts better.
>>
>> I note that linux 3.14 TCP is now so highly debloated that it is really hard to
>> compare the results we get with it with any TCP before it - the TSO offload
>> fixes, tcp small queues, etc, have really shortened and made more accurate
>> the control loops.
>>
>> second note is that the wndr can only forward packets at about 330Mbit
>> without firewall rules. Add in the firewall rules and you are looking at
>> sub 120mbit forwarding performance.
>
> Good to know, not much point in purchasing 1Gbit connectivity from my ISP unless I also replace my router.

The only things I have found that can push that are x86 boxes mostly.

Toke is evaluating a few new ones.
>
>>
>> I am jealous of your link. :)
>
> Best regards,
> --Edwin



-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-18 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-16 19:58 Dave Taht
2014-03-16 21:27 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-03-16 21:45   ` Dave Taht
2014-03-17  0:03     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-03-17  0:42     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-03-17  0:54       ` Dave Taht
2014-03-17 12:20 ` Michael Richardson
2014-03-17 13:40   ` Dave Taht
2014-03-17 14:30     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-03-17 14:39       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-03-17 14:55       ` Dave Taht
2014-03-17 14:55     ` Michael Richardson
2014-03-17 15:18       ` Dave Taht
2014-03-18 10:00 ` Török Edwin
2014-03-18 12:12   ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-03-18 14:21     ` Dave Taht
2014-03-18 15:22       ` Török Edwin
2014-03-18 15:35         ` Dave Taht
2014-03-18 16:49           ` Török Edwin
2014-03-18 17:03             ` Dave Taht [this message]
2014-03-18 17:06           ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA93jw4nKeQ+rUQ5dg8gLReNzoEVhu9C6d7M4t0tUK8CvfHriA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=edwin@etorok.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox