From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F3213B29E; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 13:40:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id i3so4055159ioo.13; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 10:40:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1i4CA2dENFfGuTdUuh4ggnpx7NwsmpP9DA6fTs9TUVE=; b=JDpcq/4EDXVlmVgxs8w2YOV6qjsAZUHvUD/hCOzJmUZkBRdLK0OW0L240jKLiq035x FDH7frESgKxYG3sN4/qbEpHtCuPU69Th5yXNPeNZ+KbqNxurhBCplEKgxMQA3yZUvDPL XdqJMjysXI7RMMdwCYXnPB7ySi8lh97EcXArWt1Twti+tyf+MMREvjdpN/AV0hVKWNUy BEN1W7EREMUUOLqSzkG/KWtnYUx2riwXXqGmZbOtfp8OyBqj2pATEgSjHRPuS2etNVXa XmE9JK0fpxaPLEg0X/QltU+ZQxTPCBXHuQTX1UmrdHPUxHf5V7kBWCiaU2ruMnuwPjbr /7NA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1i4CA2dENFfGuTdUuh4ggnpx7NwsmpP9DA6fTs9TUVE=; b=TPiu15dXxb4UfV8JzhEGkiPPlQH1Y+pHe57WMznPrc1McaQKZ5wvc8D7fPtqPHty2Q SlHa6MLayfhj5W+AhFX5399Noa/gbaKb7kx11nP47cJk5wLUHT0zhcT4jmAUFk5Dkvv9 hEPAXQNDB1uRcjaLJ9rMC5DFuHi+4RMF+ctBOlxoRn68oLUHDWGuDeebjUVe5YJseymR DMgtJDAFqdurqa7S0TVrCmIxPNZ3nCcSSVIz9gW2muUaoVxZWVx4BRXTuLyWhYjDio8H wA3+0rr9risI1i9s1UUpelS7zJ3/kWe0zKHk7+nZ4NtSIOHD2i/Fyp8MYXYWi7KbvEOA qpOA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0Iab+8RmgRyNQLJYyQxsYHBakW4PG15K5miWAa2KnB8S9aog93 CpW2kG+MBnRe6+bu4v5xa1JkvRFpoAU6WWbtYAE8K6MWXrQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtNsU7OuhZ3hZWR/7IYgt/Ll8ZHWLBlQNt0bqFSsu4W9zLV+sfJob2USdG0BSfXKCmR/11U1syKUBqPwo8JUBE= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8b57:: with SMTP id c23mr3859243iot.161.1585417206097; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 10:40:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dave Taht Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 10:39:54 -0700 Message-ID: To: cerowrt-devel , bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] some sqm and cpu performance numbers for a variety of devices X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 17:40:07 -0000 https://forum.openwrt.org/t/comparative-throughput-testing-including-nat-sq= m-wireguard-and-openvpn/44724/44 (H/T to aaron wood) The post persistently points out that openvpn tends to optimize for one direction only. This is in part due to the large internal buffer in it. I'd longed to fq it internally at one point. Similarly, wireguard suffers, but not as bad. Fixing that is easier. --=20 Make Music, Not War Dave T=C3=A4ht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-435-0729