Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Oliver Niesner <oliver.niesner@gmail.com>
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] understanding_cerowrt_buildsystem
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:16:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4tRW+C_HHBB0WD=khdAtx51XJJJESJU8phweV1xTuttQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505AC149.2000905@googlemail.com>

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Oliver Niesner
<oliver.niesner@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> After a zillion tries i managed to build a cerowrt image for myself.
> It's not really clear what happened when it fails, but sometimes building a
> package again does the trick.

When doing parallel builds, things can fail in random places as not
all the dependencies are captured in openwrt.

Also I've seen an issue when sometimes a file doesn't get built right
and fails a dependency later.

make package/{clean,compile,install}/the_package/name is usually of
help in both cases.

Sometimes merely doing a sequential build after a parallel build fails
is the only answer, too

make V=s


> Here is another question to understand  better:
>
> When building a package (eg. selecting a new one in menuconfig) does the
> buildsystem take care of
> dependencies in other "parts" of the system? Let's say i do a package which
> requires something new
> must be build in the linux kernel, but in the build before the kernel is
> already succesfully compiled. Will the
> buildsystem automatically detect that it is neccessary to build the kernel
> again, or do i have to do it
> manually, eg. do a "make clean"? My guess is that i have to do it manually.

Often it will "just work". But not often enough.

> Thanks, for clearing things up
>
> Oliver
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel



-- 
Dave Täht
http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki - "3.3.8-17 is out
with fq_codel!"

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-21 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-20  7:10 Oliver Niesner
2012-09-20 10:41 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2012-09-20 13:05   ` Mark Constable
2012-09-21 15:35     ` Dave Taht
2012-09-21 17:04       ` Mark Constable
2012-09-21 21:08       ` Maciej Soltysiak
2012-09-21 21:22         ` Dave Taht
2012-09-21 22:16 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2012-09-22  2:32   ` Outback Dingo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw4tRW+C_HHBB0WD=khdAtx51XJJJESJU8phweV1xTuttQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=oliver.niesner@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox