From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6068A21F1EC for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w61so1065464wes.29 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:53:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9L5Vo/haeFR3yw3UHfWIfq/URgkkGle6/EtFSUkSQIE=; b=FometgW9InQ2ZIASycr9cN2EthJd0bRgOz7tOFL7F9SiSMY2HA2NX887f/mO1JYlef SPZpRO8a9EyAUoXfIGEMvqvLYGOAI93Gk27T9NRoiTDFqE7w3Q24blN9xLwZ+OUDeflY 1Q1WQr9hn71VUHtbLPbATALUBQXOd1uX0/ECAO46Z8Icdhw1Yq0m/MWtdcjkB4O2yS6w FzeUsI4E5XpNUWgQEiG79tIuAztOnc8KfWh8dAx/d8oruIj6fvDlhxdU9aQoxisJP70G HlDCVdDIw1A/BtfMUJTxoqobGr+aWKT+vZyiE6QglqmSVMnCFiN4NR5J9k2FOxz60UNu nriQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.19.167 with SMTP id g7mr2440633wie.46.1398268412506; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.207.82 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:53:32 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] edgerouter LTE beta w/fq_codel upcoming X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:53:34 -0000 As I pointed out here, there is more work to be done on that front http://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX/S-FQ-CoDel-Support-Possible/m-p/799394= #M28651 Mostly my hope is to get a SQM-like shaper/aqm/scheduler rewritten in the vyatta command language that works at rates up to 200Mbit. All the published examples have problems: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mapper/bufferbloat for example, uses SFQ and a very small queue length that is probably ineffective. There have been various other examples forwarded to me that all need some love, including one very elaborate one that uses ifb semi-correctly, and then goes nutso with ack prioritization. (can't find any of these now) ... And it did look that adding BQL support was easily possible for the underlying driver, but I didn't sink any time into that - the key "driver" (it's really an interface to a binary blob) is in: drivers/net/ethernet/octeon and it's unclear how much buffering is built into the blob. --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_= indecent.article