From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8C9D21F1C6 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n5so2129784wev.28 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:35:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=oYH+IZfIK9DObJMkCoETgcpn0WXWvBIcvnWzxtJSphw=; b=hZ95tPyuTrooCE2N6nBYnrdMqdqrsE7wEJBHKF/yeV6FxMBjod3DWFMZm34hIEQRvY M/502HsCz1B0AsZOEn5IE+k1lq3HwNetkYDzspK8IrN4VrSY34x1a254chYPFdRKCaUb NsnS04QsAHWvLWVlDvIsrd8gN7Zo53f6F71xisVxjdnxHiq2Vg+i7qKPna7rAqQ+QnrK SutJ1mU9OUULgaVLVOMvWn7LCFM2yic13Pj7RvIallglE0GKxnCteRrqv2XdkLsVoNCH tg1yOUyFk5TVaH0VBIhnIABuMupE5bLhGGy8MCzM3BApGf0AqeGH2LTycxBqbA3HMJGA PKEA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.189.132 with SMTP id gi4mr333950wic.19.1376688939446; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:35:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.48.129 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:35:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:35:39 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Teco Boot Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3529433b88504e4175f4c Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , Juliusz Chroboczek , Steven Barth , Hannes Frederic Sowa , Felix Fietkau Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] IPv6 address assignment and naming X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 21:35:42 -0000 --001a11c3529433b88504e4175f4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Teco Boot wrote: > The IPv6 subtrees in on its way :-). After 3.11 we can ask for backports. > I folded it into cerowrt 3.10.7-1 just now. No noise on the patch. I was scared by some of the backtraces you posted, so I'd like to keep the testing simple for a while... and... I still have the ADSL htb fixes to fold back in from 3.11 to 3.10, to massively update cisco's pie implementation, and to make one more tweak to codel, before I do anything other than compile testing, personally. Probably will be a couple days. I have no idea the state of the babel branch on this stuff. My own use case is a system with multiple 6rd, 6in4, 6to4 tunnels in play.... One of my concerns was that: is there an easy way to detect at runtime via netlink if subtrees was working correctly or not? --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html --001a11c3529433b88504e4175f4c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl><= /span> wrote:
The IPv6 subtrees in on its way :-). After 3= .11 we can ask for backports.

I folded = it into cerowrt 3.10.7-1 just now. No noise on the patch. I was scared by s= ome of the backtraces you posted, so I'd like to keep the testing simpl= e for a while... and...

I still have the ADSL htb fixes to fold back in from 3.11 to= 3.10, to massively update cisco's pie implementation, and to make one = more tweak to codel, before I do anything other than compile testing, perso= nally.

Probably will be a couple days.

I have no idea the state of the = babel branch on this stuff. My own use case is a system with multiple 6rd, = 6in4, 6to4 tunnels in play....

One of my concerns was that: is ther= e an easy way to detect at runtime via netlink if subtrees was working corr= ectly or not?


--
Dave T=E4ht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerow= rt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html=20
--001a11c3529433b88504e4175f4c--