Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Maciej Soltysiak <maciej@soltysiak.com>
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt 3.8.8-4 released
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 11:12:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw54Q-wZCo61X0JR=mBL4CJD8E9kR27i05eiGanj2sguaw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMZR1YDFOwN=2x3d14buBNNXfHB7G1yhUko2LL0=pBGL2m6O4Q@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3903 bytes --]

I note that 3.8.X has been kind of a disappointing kernel series
(notably the ADSL bug) and I'm not intending to ship a cero based on it.
Please feel free to keep hacking cero forward or reverting to Modena.

Also, after my very long trip around the eu...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quAaZKBHvs8

I'm taking a *vacation*. This will be my last read email for at least a
week.

In addition to the ongoing evals of other ath9k based boards...

I have a ton of boards like these on order or backorder:

http://linuxgizmos.com/wandboard-gains-quad-core-cpu-and-enhanced-gpu/

http://linuxgizmos.com/beaglebone-black-climbs-the-device-tree-with-linux-3-8/

On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Maciej Soltysiak <maciej@soltysiak.com>wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> I installed 3.8.8-4 more than a month ago but it took me this long to give
> up  trying to get DLNA working.
> For some reason those DLNA discovery (SSDP) multicasts seem not forward
> between se00 and sw00 or sw10 so the devices cannot find themselves. This
> is supposed to be done by minissdpd.
>

Have you tried disabling the firewall rules entirely?


>
> I know previously we've had it broken but you fixed it by adding some
> missing config in the kernel for IGMP I believe.
> But I'm unable to find the cause this time.
>
>
I am puzzled. IGMP was working in 3.7


> Would you suggest I have a go with a more recent cero release or does
> anything come to mind when I describe the issue?
>
> Best regards,
> Maciej Soltysiak
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> + Refresh to openwrt barrier breaker head
>>
>>    this now contains nearly all the patches formerly separately in
>> cerowrt!
>>
>>    ++ fq_codel is on by default on ALL interfaces with default quantum of
>> 300
>>         (yes, openwrt has obsoleted pfifo_fast!)
>>    ++ unaligned access patches, etc, etc
>>    + dhcp-pd SERVER support
>>  the usual multitude of other openwrt fixes... all tested extensively
>> at the battlemesh conference.
>>
>> + Update to dnsmasq 2.67test2
>>
>> Toke got really busy in building his own version of cero and adding
>>
>> + AQM scripts and gui
>> + tahoe-lafs added (untested)
>> + uftp4 updated
>>
>> - no upnp/ssdp fix because I'm clueless
>>
>> Yep, "AQM" gui now. /deep hat tip to toke for writing that. No need to
>> fiddle with any scripts now....
>>
>> I guess of largest import here, underlying the gui, is that I had a
>> chance to deeply look at simple_qos.sh. There are several bugs in it,
>> that appear actually in the underlying tc subsystem.On ingress, the
>> priority queue was not being used properly, and a few other things
>> were odd in ipv6.
>>
>> Out of frustration with that, and based on the data we'd got back from
>> cablelabs, I wrote the simplest possible rate limited fq_codel
>> implementation, using a reduced number of flows and a single tier of
>> htb only - and that works surprisingly well.
>>
>> It's called "Simplest" in the new AQM screen. Give it a shot.
>>
>> Secondly, the exercise of writing that and comparing it to the simple_qos
>> script
>>
>> .... seems to have exposed a bug in htb at low bandwidths.
>>
>> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/dsl384k-htb-bug.svg
>>
>> Here I was trying at 384k up and 8Mbit down, and the middle portion of
>> the upload graph there is kind of... impossible. At higher rates I
>> haven't seen this happen.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Täht
>>
>> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
>> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>
>
>


-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5687 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2013-06-02 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-24  8:55 Dave Taht
2013-04-24  8:55 ` Dave Taht
2013-04-24 14:07 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2013-04-24 15:56   ` Dave Taht
2013-04-25  0:06     ` Rich Brown
2013-04-25  5:56       ` Dave Taht
2013-04-25 14:04         ` Maciej Soltysiak
2013-04-25  7:45       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2013-06-02 18:00 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2013-06-02 18:12   ` Dave Taht [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw54Q-wZCo61X0JR=mBL4CJD8E9kR27i05eiGanj2sguaw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=maciej@soltysiak.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox