From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com (mail-ie0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FD2221F182 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:41:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 17so9073602iea.16 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:41:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z9MeS8iwdbYqHKJzU3rGBnPwRU0Z1MCBqT6EtnZ/lH4=; b=XC9cu8LIHKBu1CrhTvqfsh1soDfVurfU39f1rOq0bmnWjcphMph9Ft97RYxeM4PMMR iwvfUHoh5ljEiAtpgA1Baag34Xp3rZC1uqs3/ULUfio9rqMF9Q6Mk2m3HEakkCOIna63 dQBaAF/8ZZJUgTP6pwHAdCbiq7iGFf5nD8CRUlgsbX9VmSPFL0urkaVPpn4+UrhmKCg6 zcz3gLhAkGumbcLF/JwAveRmMtUt3f/i04EpE/Ug3vBzwwVd4FNP+rOCuQoKj7syzmhv mFDMutE6YcXspoOfgFnUZV+gobhbDHZOkU6uEBTEB9W1CrfqD1mrJHHNprg4qBM0SXue 6JwQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.81.18 with SMTP id x18mr10397970ick.1.1355128919110; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:41:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.135.39 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:41:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:41:59 +0100 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, Steven Barth Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Current state of ipv6 in openwrt barrier breaker X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:42:00 -0000 I just noticed this thread went over to cerowrt-users and cerowrt-devel is the right place to discuss these issues. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Steven Barth Date: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:38 AM Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-users] IPv6 router advertisements on custom interface= s To: cerowrt-users Fyi I've commited a new ipv6-support version to OpenWrt yesterday. This includes (partly untested) all features I want to see in there for OpenWrt except the integration of dnsmasq-dhcpv6 (which will follow later once the dynamic configuration features have been added to it) and the WebUI which is still on the ToDo. So far the current IPv6-featureset is: * Support for native IPv6 with static configuration * Support for native IPv6 with DHCPv6-Prefix Delegation * Support for native IPv6 without PD via relaying or masquerading * Support for 6in4, 6to4 and 6rd * Prefixes are automatically split up and distributed over downstream-interfaces OR by choice mapped to an ULA-address (NPT66). Help, documentation and configuration examples for yesterdays version can be found here (there were a few changes for the new NPT-support): http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6 Especially the NPT / NAT-related stuff has seen very little testing and of course only works with a Kernel >=3D 3.7 and ip6tables >=3D 1.4.17. On 10.12.2012 08:56, Dave Taht wrote: > > Radvd is going away in the BB ("barrier breaker" - openwrt head) > version of openwrt, fairly soon. It deserves to die... > > There is going to be a merger of the DHCPv6/SLAAC and naming > functionalities in dnsmasq and the dynamicism of the new ipv6-support > package, which also includes a spanking new dhcpv6-pd client.. > > Also planned is to (once the 3.7 kernel lands) make npt66 the default > (for most users). So in a couple weeks, all the underlying ipv6 > infrastructure in openwrt and cerowrt is going to change. > > As to whether the 6in4 case is fully handled as of now in that system, > damned if I know. Same goes for 6to4... I put the ipv6-support package > into cerowrt 3.6.9-5, all forms of ipv6 are blocked at the lincs lab, > can't test it, right now. > > As for how to fix it in cerowrt 3.3.8, it was always problematic as > hell, and I'm glad the work is being re-architected in BB by two of > the most competent people I know, and I've signed cerowrt (and thus, > y'all) up to test it when it comes out. It would be great to recruit > more help, because *this time* we're going to get it right, come hell > or high water. > > I'm very pleased, in particular, with dnsmasq's naming support for > slaac. It "just works". > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Michael Richardson w= rote: >> >> >> First question, why are there two radvd processes? >> >> 3343 root 964 S /usr/sbin/radvd -C /var/etc/radvd.conf -m stder= r_sys >> 3345 root 964 S /usr/sbin/radvd -C /var/etc/radvd.conf -m stder= r_sys >> >> Is this just a thread issue? >> >> second question, none of my custom interfaces are in /var/etc/radvd.conf= ? >> >> Can I hack /etc/config/firewall directly rather than go through the UI? >> I think so....? >> >> Could I attach blinking LEDs to VLANs? >> (ps: whatever problems I had with ethernet mii between my cerowrt and >> a cisco 200-26 switch in the summer, seems to have gone away) >> >> On an IPv6 interface which is not my uplink, I think that IPv6 gateway >> should be blank. That the router should advertise iself. >> >> I also think that the words "Send router soliciations" is wrong, that it >> should say, "Send router advertisements". >> >> I had to put my custom interfaces into /etc/config/radvd. >> >> config interface >> option interface 'trusted' >> option AdvSendAdvert '1' >> option AdvRouterAddr '1' >> option AdvLinkMTU '1480' >> option ignore '0' >> option IgnoreIfMissing '1' >> option AdvSourceLLAddress '1' >> option AdvDefaultPreference 'medium' >> option AdvOtherConfigFlag '1' >> >> config prefix >> option interface 'trusted' >> list prefix '' >> option AdvOnLink '1' >> option AdvAutonomous '1' >> option AdvRouterAddr '0' >> option ignore '0' >> >> I don't see a place in the UI where this is edited, but I could be >> missing it. >> >> -- >> ] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firew= alls [ >> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net arc= hitect[ >> ] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device = driver[ >> Kyoto Plus: watch the video >> then sign the petition. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-users mailing list >> Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users > > > > _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-users mailing list Cerowrt-users@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-users --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html