From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt1-x842.google.com (mail-qt1-x842.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::842]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 093D73BA8E; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 19:20:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x842.google.com with SMTP id s1so4667856qte.5; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:20:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vdosA0xQNOD0q6UGxGfmReFFs/Vu3aM5/Y4Mw6yNafw=; b=PoVp8lZr5cixuSwwIhFFyQdkeAqPgAMr1O35zh8RV70wSKyEmAksHLcHyhc44yUGmM 9viiO6TRgDh2Md1+nLqSu4jGjUQoAC4g5YckQLyxSB9OJvMawn6z65Rc1BWVWc2k/CTd gTRXDL9o3hs/RveRBwT32XH4Lp6S/xPT8xaE414gCQ3mf+0jemo3MbknnTSKtcM7y0DV +C9s0WF/9VLvQtX25uFu00N4S6bYysrZ0n7bA7IkRPYv/Ey3OjH45QieOQ9FqogeJJkP sdx1OGZaLsrixyHuK1bD2lDlngTEnjVtlvsvi/99Hwc5EhPBPO7/80QGFNveqr975xCA luTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vdosA0xQNOD0q6UGxGfmReFFs/Vu3aM5/Y4Mw6yNafw=; b=WyPKeB7ZDm7Tx9SY0ojAZAmzzNR8k24Vje1cXruDmX3U6VRshgG4mZBnfQciL1V/rC PBPB23ZiyhHk8RX38nG8oF8+Xctwa96YXSUvyX1IXWyiI/TDblCpHAaze4asHa5B5nQq YcgfmOwuZDEPAYrcCfs76rANRfQLy81tVjrreoj/NL6AGGfsCSwQhxsnUwIRDooGWL4a 7c1xu2mzzpYYYTjf5E1cW4cVyO9sdvVTLrWPTHfch+UN2eVYdPatCL7II2M9iVuqrEUf 5QBbse4DTz3ULdxPajg99yXJuXCpk4JKTsEnu4EG5wsgGxxvrAu3bfbUxvepC4h7Ov+9 eHYw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWK2VqbEOC/80r6TAhX/lRhoZZWdqsDi2OIBNQVXxh51k6fcKe6 dXLhzElBQ4WJ4S1CuHMP1t2V1KobRpaktwoJ/OFeEA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwBX4TGiKGs7tlUEMteYCVQUx5+QgBeCA1SYPIy6qspbW9gdFZKo6LmkUmjt6fPdxZv34E8V3sS/plN9Ok7hIA= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:bb98:: with SMTP id i24mr32925611qvg.129.1552432834424; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:20:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dave Taht Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:20:22 -0700 Message-ID: To: Pete Heist Cc: Cake List , cerowrt-devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Cake] looking for some testers this week X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 23:20:35 -0000 On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 2:24 PM Pete Heist wrote: > > > > On Mar 12, 2019, at 4:19 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > > > > We already made the 240/4 address range work in openwrt in december. > > This patch adds in other formerly reserved address ranges: > > > > 1) https://github.com/dtaht/unicast-extensions/blob/master/patches/linu= x/0001-Allow-0.0.0.0-8-and-reduce-localnet-and-enable-225-2.patch > > > > And it would be good to know if these addresses worked at all, on > > wifi, and through nat. We hit a limit in the netifd daemon last time. > > > > (this is in relation to my moonshot talk at netdevconf. Which is > > totally a moonshot) > > Yes, this rfc and patch are off the deep end. :) Then again, I haven=E2= =80=99t used the Mbone since =E2=80=9995 on IRIX, so I for one am ok with k= illing that dead. It had 16 remaining nodes 12 years ago, which is the last we heard from it. > Working on building my first OpenWRT image, ever. Does 32-bit mips do you= much good? mips big endian test is good. Endianess always bites me on the wrong side of the egg. > I guess I=E2=80=99ll just see what I can do with two boxes somewhere on 2= 24.0.0.0/4... only 225/8-231/8 are opened up from the relevant reserved for multicast space by this patch series. They have always been unassigned addresses. I did not change the userspace IN_MULTICAST macro, but nearly nothing in userspace checks that. 224/8 is used by a half dozen common applications and reserved by a few hundred old ones. Theoretically we could use 224.6/16 and up but it was simpler to do 224. 232 and up is unclear. > > 2) I hope we have the first SCE ( > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morton-taht-tsvwg-sce-00 ) patchset > > up fairly soon for fq_codel_fast (my out of tree mildly improved > > fq_codel), and sch_cake. Maybe Freebsd also, if anyone here runs that. > > Looking forward to that patch (esp. Cake). > > > There's one other thing I'd like to test, if at all possible - that's > > the new babel-hmac code. > > Likely too much for me to digest before the conference. --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740