From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (mail-ie0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAA9021F1DC for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:04:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 9so11340684iec.27 for ; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:04:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+mivbmn2Kp9eXxN7PBZEtyFMLAdZTdYAx+RqWRMinxc=; b=VxfngcdXt5w2DesCLxft8LiDwcO2pNLb7hCBmakZSn8gU5h9mHo72UsbO+I2sVJMmi VedkAuxfgrmZg39lYSEPs2z/e5jHG2Qg7CtMgFz5JaMGC+UrmBzECntLJwx0x6GCWMY5 cRnLc4yhSFd8AGxKRiNanGEBJkZziUyhSmlpjMHRkYQ58Q6qFPJyOAOve3s7o/ZK3Ual AOqU42vx4Z8tGZeTjDqdMdzp+v+cNB38FN9jYNEqlj+n/yswmKfX0q7E11mCjhukwK/l B7s3coYu1t7hwFj7HT0qQsNd/zSPJrRBMaTLugsq3bv70kSzpS5ZbQDIkez+RxLp2Wf4 iZuA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.72.49 with SMTP id a17mr1593579igv.36.1370624652232; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:04:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.35.44 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:04:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2FB25374-452D-414E-9056-016C0C2C4FF8@imap.cc> References: <2FB25374-452D-414E-9056-016C0C2C4FF8@imap.cc> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:04:12 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Fred Stratton Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc9e5084512404de936ba0 Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.8.13-6 No name resolution over wireless X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 17:04:13 -0000 --047d7bdc9e5084512404de936ba0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Fred Stratton wrote: > Taeht wants all User posting on this list. > No, just posts about dev versions. I note that what you are fiddling with is not even a released dev version. Toke's doing builds too but he's trying to finish a thesis... I REALLY appreciate the testing but I'm not planning on installing anything myself until after the adsl fixes for htb stablize, and not until after june 17th regardless. (I do try to keep up with openwrt head so as to minimize problems with CI (continuous integration)). The only things different in -6 are a newer dnsmasq, some aqm script improvements, and a patch for 6in4 stuff... hmm, I should mention that. > > I am not a developer, though you need a certain skill set to manipulate > Cerowrt as a user. > yep! It's not for grandma yet! > > The weather here is good, whilst the rest of Europe drowns, and poorer > wireless reception has come with the sunshine, which hampers > troubleshooting. > I am glad to be back at the yurtlab where all the code in use is cero. > > This build works better on ADSL, so I am reluctant to regress to an > earlier one. > the aqm code continues to evolve. What is in the next build has been more thoroughly tested (on an atom box) but Jesper's ADSL fix remains pending. > > Ethernet connected clients work as expected. > > Wireless clients connect, but neither Ubuntu 12.04.2 nor ML machines can > resolve URIs. > Hmm. I note there is a bug in dnsmasq here under tcp, fixed in the latest test release of dnsmasq, but I don't understand what's going on for you. Do your wireless clients get a dns server? what does nslookup report? > > I suspect this is a configuration problem. /etc/config/wireless is > difficult to understand with so many routed interfaces. > > 3.8.13-5 did not have the problem. > there was an update to dnsmasq in this non-release, but so far as I knew it was a fix, not a regression. > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html --047d7bdc9e5084512404de936ba0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Fred Str= atton <fredstratton@imap.cc> wrote:
Taeht wants all User posting on this list.

No, jus= t posts about dev versions. I note that what you are fiddling with is not e= ven a released dev version. Toke's doing builds too but he's trying= to finish a thesis...

I REALLY appreciate the testing but I'm not planning on installing = anything myself until after the adsl fixes for htb stablize, and not until = after june 17th regardless. (I do try to keep up with openwrt head so as to= minimize problems with CI (continuous integration)).

The only things different in -6 are a newer dnsmasq, some aqm script im= provements, and a patch for 6in4 stuff... hmm, I should mention that.
= =A0

I am not a developer, though you need a certain skill set to manipulate Cer= owrt as a user.

yep! It's not for grandma yet!=
=A0

The weather here is good, whilst the rest of Europe drowns, and poorer wire= less reception has come with the sunshine, which hampers troubleshooting.

I am glad to be back at the yurtlab where all the c= ode in use is cero.
=A0

This build works better on ADSL, so I am reluctant to regress to an earlier= one.

the aqm code continues to evolve. What is in= the next build has been
more thoroughly tested (on an atom box) but Jes= per's ADSL fix remains pending.
=A0

Ethernet connected clients work as expected.

Wireless clients connect, but neither Ubuntu 12.04.2 nor ML machines can re= solve URIs.

Hmm. I note there is a bug in dnsmasq = here under tcp, fixed in the latest test release of dnsmasq, but I don'= t understand what's going on for you.

Do your wireless clients get a dns server? what does nslookup report?
=A0

I suspect this is a configuration problem. /etc/config/wireless is difficul= t to understand with so many routed interfaces.

3.8.13-5 did not have the problem.

there was an up= date to dnsmasq in this non-release, but so far as I knew it was a fix, not= a regression.
=A0


_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel



--
Dave T=E4ht

Fixi= ng bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.ht= ml=20 --047d7bdc9e5084512404de936ba0--