Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: JF Tremblay <jean-francois.tremblay@viagenie.ca>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] ONetSwitch
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:21:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw59W8iP9by1y_9OD07o6ss02jDN76WwOAUimjjXW7AnTg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29DFB74F-60AA-4CE9-97DD-7888E474D29D@viagenie.ca>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1977 bytes --]

I had fired them off an email a few days ago, it looked like very exciting
stuff,
and a good base for further efforts into getting core bits of code finally
into
hardware.

Assuming they reply sanely I plan to support their kickstarter, and I would
hope others here would too. I am not as broke as usual and was planning
on buying another zedboard, and will just send them that check instead.

I had already
assembled a similar set of stuff (zedboard, fmc 4 port card, netfpga´s DRR
implementation [1], the senic rate limiter [2]) - but lack time or funding
to
pursue that further.

These folk already are using a
much better 4 port chip for ethernet and seem to have assembled other
key pieces like pcie support, that make for building the "perfect" debloated
device all the more possible.

And their projected costs are about 1/20th what I would have expected to
do the same thing in the US for.

I have also realized that as much as I would like to be designing circuits
again
things like vivado have a steep learning curve. I really, really liked
chisel [3]
though. So leveraging their efforts for future hardware work strikes me as
a very good idea...

[1] https://github.com/NetFPGA/netfpga/wiki/DRRNetFPGA
[2] http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~ssradhak/Papers/senic-nsdi14.pdf
[3] https://chisel.eecs.berkeley.edu/


On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:10 AM, JF Tremblay <
jean-francois.tremblay@viagenie.ca> wrote:

> Just came across this.
> Any thoughts about this platform? A bit pricey, and the wi-fi is an
> add-on. Based on Zynq 7030 dual-core.
>
>
> https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/onetswitch/onetswitch-open-source-hardware-for-networking
>
> JF
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>



-- 
Dave Täht

thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3128 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2015-02-17 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-17 18:10 JF Tremblay
2015-02-17 18:21 ` Dave Taht [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA93jw59W8iP9by1y_9OD07o6ss02jDN76WwOAUimjjXW7AnTg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=jean-francois.tremblay@viagenie.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox