From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C94021F28F for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:21:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id wp18so54130662obc.8 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:21:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=QnTrjgYav/gyhqh4IQOkwB16J7UYd0i93/P5cImxi1I=; b=UUzAvXTdMEKXwvG8zBWwD5fW4MzL/9c58aZX/CutbXHrzQdlW4K0PjGNlGVX7UhZ39 TegVizZOGH7dj+eHfjCRUNlr7UBaeEGQ2a0jrTg4fVMZB5hUJzFKHFeIpCU9GsfklSAM qi9tbZ72WWPueqMKdWaK8pJcmk20DDT38xOandsufXZZJQ19LUoau/ekiOWrjkRnF2cl Y2LHbxX1Ah962lfHYwAAWniF97rSyc18Mk5NtRnaHpdslvpCth+HxCCsjYLjvGu8KlB2 PRxpaPiRSmKGyNQiAeMQfr7Q3bM+o5J5AEn7YT8UU0g39cuEoYo86UD4LxK8x32wlOOa zdaQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.103.234 with SMTP id fz10mr16107376oeb.11.1424197312684; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:21:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.51.66 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:21:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <29DFB74F-60AA-4CE9-97DD-7888E474D29D@viagenie.ca> References: <29DFB74F-60AA-4CE9-97DD-7888E474D29D@viagenie.ca> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:21:52 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: JF Tremblay Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115e868e9a6ef050f4cc683 Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] ONetSwitch X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:22:22 -0000 --089e0115e868e9a6ef050f4cc683 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I had fired them off an email a few days ago, it looked like very exciting stuff, and a good base for further efforts into getting core bits of code finally into hardware. Assuming they reply sanely I plan to support their kickstarter, and I would hope others here would too. I am not as broke as usual and was planning on buying another zedboard, and will just send them that check instead. I had already assembled a similar set of stuff (zedboard, fmc 4 port card, netfpga=C2=B4s= DRR implementation [1], the senic rate limiter [2]) - but lack time or funding to pursue that further. These folk already are using a much better 4 port chip for ethernet and seem to have assembled other key pieces like pcie support, that make for building the "perfect" debloate= d device all the more possible. And their projected costs are about 1/20th what I would have expected to do the same thing in the US for. I have also realized that as much as I would like to be designing circuits again things like vivado have a steep learning curve. I really, really liked chisel [3] though. So leveraging their efforts for future hardware work strikes me as a very good idea... [1] https://github.com/NetFPGA/netfpga/wiki/DRRNetFPGA [2] http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~ssradhak/Papers/senic-nsdi14.pdf [3] https://chisel.eecs.berkeley.edu/ On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:10 AM, JF Tremblay < jean-francois.tremblay@viagenie.ca> wrote: > Just came across this. > Any thoughts about this platform? A bit pricey, and the wi-fi is an > add-on. Based on Zynq 7030 dual-core. > > > https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/onetswitch/onetswitch-open-source-ha= rdware-for-networking > > JF > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks --089e0115e868e9a6ef050f4cc683 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I had fired them off an emai= l a few days ago, it looked like very exciting stuff,
and a g= ood base for further efforts into getting core bits of code finally into hardware.

Assuming they reply sanely I plan to su= pport their kickstarter, and I would
hope others here would too. I am no= t as broke as usual and was planning
on buying another zedboa= rd, and will just send them that check instead.

I had alr= eady
assembled a similar set of stuff (zedboard, fmc 4 port card, netfpg= a=C2=B4s DRR
implementation [1], the senic rate limiter [2]) - but= lack time or funding to
pursue that further.

These folk alread= y are using a
much better 4 port chip for ethernet and seem to have ass= embled other
key pieces like pcie support, that make for building the &q= uot;perfect" debloated
device all the more possible.

A= nd their projected costs are about 1/20th what I would have expected to
= do the same thing in the US for.

I have also realized that as = much as I would like to be designing circuits again
things like vi= vado have a steep learning curve. I really, really liked chisel [3]
tho= ugh. So leveraging their efforts for future hardware work strikes me as
a very good idea...
--089e0115e868e9a6ef050f4cc683--