From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 278AC21F509 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbgp2 with SMTP id gp2so37150170obb.2 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:59:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FgAM3zy4YA7+glRULoMmDfRJ9UdXT4MEB3xwG6YJJhI=; b=VkA/nk+ShXD450R1OAjJ8aOMnNQ1faqZfrmIP2QeoxL9jUQcEv9C97DvWRQRQHPKQr 6aOnpg+kLsH/xJivcoIHwIJcTESilORAnW5WH8PZX7qCaj1zM31FLG5Jg7G6hr+BOCRn l5zLUmLUeWOq+NwYsSIEdsHA82D+lOj2E30TbWPrgqizW7fC7Wh9vAz0s5c4PTf7Ucz8 6I++rsXVBF1CY1udLS96UC6SMttt82cTvVAU2Jp62IEpCiE9Ve6dSnIQKjFKwh9LZSvh 4RfaiircfGVvf8baYq3+XC05PEMcXoB00SjS9MdhQtWuTpVn0nj3Y3YJBraxYa+D4nJL GzDA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.230.67 with SMTP id sw3mr5485683obc.0.1434560372609; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.105.129 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:59:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878ubiimji.fsf@alrua-desktop.borgediget.toke.dk> References: <878ubiimji.fsf@alrua-desktop.borgediget.toke.dk> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:59:32 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] libmusl woes X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:00:02 -0000 On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:47 AM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > Dave Taht writes: > >> I am not sure how (or even if I should) to switch back to uclibc, The bigger question is: is openwrt's future direction musl? I don't mind switching, but would prefer to switch in the right direction. > Advanced configuration options (for developers) -> Toolchain Options -> > C library implementation. Trunk builds fine with uClibc as far as I can > tell... make dirclean helped clean up the mess. Going to try both uclibc and musl build again. (really did want to "see" what an linksys 1900ac did... did not anticipate it being so hard) > > Tried fixing tinc, but it appears to be a clash within the header files > with no solution forthcoming. See > http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2012/10/11/4 > > This script seems to fix it by modifying the Linux headers, but figure > that is not feasible for an openwrt package recipe... > https://github.com/lancethepants/tinc-arm-musl-static/blob/master/tinc.sh= #L148 > > -Toke --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast