From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7320121F1B8 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:19:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id e11so5259842iej.15 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:19:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XQJqLCXgUm/2hk7kbk+Ynu2r02sKPXqE+dcHjNo4dd8=; b=vGQfPCdB6RP5FKjfYxWNiHDIjLnZJIN9Pqwvareba0dZY2OEj3TZ9X87r+4Qr5eeDu b7IXaWVeXaWSsHXgzlRzBbzV/he2+3Tr0RfuZcczkUm4TBztaIJolvplKV4rm4RIRcZl 2G0rBvRqFquFBs4KcrQ54AvVIsk+EyLias/mP+9gL1I4WCAiXRKU9VCaDwuky400OmI7 76LE5KW17TlFkVlc71KDmrhRekBBmMMMMJsOvcij9ESBJardqckynCDbCj+hcyY81fBo au2Jo6wUQ1T17v/dDl2NeU1C9R7GXnu2u9oJ42ctZxBZ2W1D4MTeCMSKYFdVh6vzDGOI XEOQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.11.13 with SMTP id m13mr3238812igb.32.1371410367766; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.45.137 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:19:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8738shsx3w.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:19:27 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland=2DJ=F8rgensen?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] trivial 6in4 fix(?) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:19:28 -0000 ok, 3.8.13-7 committed, tagged, and pushed. Sorry about that... If you could redo that test with simplest.qos or with the rrul_noclassification test, it would be interesting, then with the patches, again... TIA. On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > I don't think I pushed out the 6in4 patch into the build. Hell, I > forgot to tag it too. Remind me to take a vacation next vacation? > > If these patches aren't in your build, it looks like we are indeed > only using one class for fq_codel 6in4 traffic and thus are reverting > to nearly pure codel behavior rather than fq_codel. > > I might be getting good at reading the patterns here - it looks like > this is fq_codel rather than nfq_codel? > > # target/linux/generic/patches-3.8/677-flow_dissector-Add-6in4-supp= ort-to-hash-keys.patch > # target/linux/generic/patches-3.8/678-Handle-encapsulated-ipv6-bet= ter.patch > # target/linux/generic/patches-3.8/678-remove-bad-timeout-logic-in-= fast-recovery.patch > > as > > tc -s class show dev ge00 output during the test seems to show only one o= r two > tc classes in use. > > But a better test if you are using simplest.qos, rather than > simplest.qos, would be the 4BE test. > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Toke H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen wrote: >> Dave Taht writes: >> >>> I am curious: Is there a current user of cero using simplest.qos, >>> tunneling ipv6 via hurricane or 6to4, that can hammer it with multiple >>> ipv6 streams (as in the rrul test)? (If you have rrul and ipv6, you >>> can force it to do pure ipv6 testing with the -6 option.) >> >> Attaching a plot of rrul over ipv6 while running cerowrt-3.8.13-17 (or >> my own build based on it that, is), and some output of tc -s class show >> dev ge00 while the test was running. >> >> IPv4 pings stay flat at 45ms to the same host while the test is running. >> >> -Toke >> > > > > -- > Dave T=E4ht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscrib= e.html --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html