From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94FDA2013A1 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 19:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by werm1 with SMTP id m1so3230267wer.16 for ; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 19:48:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v+BOAr1gc1Rmc3tHScFygjhD6GIO3AHHodP9VV5xYjI=; b=Fynz7egDD+H0SHhCnTBTSsHDiFce1789LktDqZjQtNvbfzUIC3whF4drhz6eDBQNqB TBNySm3j9ZTnVpwd1mJtE9W6vT2p4gyDsrOP14Z+eWKcpTT3wtu3dUFI4UoPKZIuVpoz AFXwK2DhzVJv7+4l2ArR5FcYVLzYukQj9c6pxwPNIC+KwFTUFDty510cyRwCBIgMqw5g 9nK31PWxeylVE+AMuIHbNKiDugjZXgxPjucVfCDXlq2iCwWSSQOME2JCeCH1ONhp9tJ0 pbg7wasK8Go2ZyHxlofHtHYEbh4gUu4FxNQeL6+2Ku7gb34mxyvfnxcZAMZryd+nFq7j DU0A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.88.199 with SMTP id bi7mr379520wib.12.1333766885280; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 19:48:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.127.194 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 19:48:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 19:48:05 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Richard Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt 3.3.1-4 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 02:48:08 -0000 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Richard Brown wrote: > Dave, > > Congratulations on taming the wifi, hat off to the guys at openwrt for 99.% of that.... > adding CUBIC, and otherwise getting CeroWrt building and working again. S= orry you're still suffering with #113. Questions: > > 1) Is 3.3.1-4 worth posting for testing? I installed it and it seems to b= e operating fine. (DNS names *were* dead for a while after reboot. It seeme= d like only a couple minutes before the router began supplying them.) Your tolerance for "first boot" time pain is higher than mine. > 2) If 3.3.1-4 is good enough for testing, we should update the release no= tes. Let me know what has changed, and I'll update the page. http://www.buf= ferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/CeroWrt_33_Release_Notes I'm sitting here watching a video feed that Steinar Gunderson, just gave me of the 'gathering' http://www.gathering.org/tg12/en/ over ipv6. from norway. at 720p. over udp. through cerowrt. through sfqred. to my laptop. and it looks and sounds pretty darn good. Too bad I don't speak the languag= e. cero's otherwise been through the wrigner for 3 days, it's worth letting out for more testing, so yes... as for what changed... I guess I'll write it but not tonight. > I'm corresponding with Travis at OpenWrt to see what is necessary to devo= te the spares cycles on my quad-core box at home to the OpenWrt buildbot sy= stem. I'll let you know when there's something to report. I think that being able to distribute a linux vm that 'just works' to build openwrt and/or cerowrt would be a goodness. It would help out mac and pc guys a lot. (this is mildly different than having a vm that's a buildslave... but doing both in one vm seems feasible and desirable) I'm trying to scrounge up more hardware. I could easily light up 40 boxes and over a hundred cpus on this task, even if the problem was under control. I think I maybe able to scrounge a few boxes but the electricity and rack space needed to run them... > > Best, > > Rich > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://www.bufferbloat.net