From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7161321F309; Sat, 23 May 2015 23:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obcus9 with SMTP id us9so37182263obc.2; Sat, 23 May 2015 23:44:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Piwlb0PnTAOLlJifvlpmG6/IDIlVk4+dUKE11lNWocM=; b=f/f38vuHLHM7nP4JjyrsKKTpeXzgJ8eC8XiKT143G07ZxCCgQlxuN7WyWtgRDk7D/H x6d+egVrf7V7CJ9mtnP/nIPTEUDI59ytJBv4HOycurNavVCNi7DXbWIPUAUasBEyvw/y 9QBVaVqg53egOg2Q60GPH/w8FGgyPkRxLzwAiLfnJz95uta9et0M1QjitwFzY+6V1t/M uwNU3hvra/gj13Ch/olgHexiwVGUmq8Y2td87diApbj2yyAQPTRhUZ6HXPfB6Xr6xYrL x3X/fAHExfYExzEAeil0lwbA0Oz48pdc1i+9DVnqt1I0IuXn6WHZWlEfT2KUbcZUHsHb ggPw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.4.138 with SMTP id 132mr12121907oie.11.1432449873880; Sat, 23 May 2015 23:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.105.146 with HTTP; Sat, 23 May 2015 23:44:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 23:44:33 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Aaron Wood Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: cerowrt-devel , bloat Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] sqm-scripts on WRT1900AC X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 06:45:06 -0000 yes, as it turned out I too was watching even linksys's unannounced products enter the openwrt mainline with great joy (a core dev (imre) does some work for them). I had fiddled with it a few months back... ... and I had tried to do a build w/cake+pie+fq_pie for it a few days ago but the toolchain broke on my increasingly out of date main build box (snapon). The right answer there is to get that stuff built out of the main openwrt build system... The marvell wifi driver for that box was dramatically improved last christmas with fresh code from marvell, but I have not looked at it closely to see how well the structure of the driver or the hardware could align with the goals of make-wifi-fast. (has anyone? I am still in pain from the ath10k work...) the mvneta ethernet driver lacked bql when last I looked and was really agressive about GRO offloads in particular. Both are easily fixable. And it has a fan. Hate fans. Amusingly (I guess), I had this same chipset to fiddle with in the "mirabox" and it ran waaaay too hot. It is not clear why you are getting an inaccurate rate out of it, either. It is a leading candidate, but I would prefer to find a hardware partner that cared about our issues enough to work with us, rather than ignore us as netgear did.