Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Cerowrt-devel] SQM and BCP38 packages submitted for review at openwrt-devel
@ 2014-03-29 19:07 Dave Taht
  2014-03-30 22:33 ` Dave Taht
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2014-03-29 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cerowrt-devel

I have submitted the current sqm-scripts, luci-app-sqm, and bcp38
packages as RFCs for openwrt's consideration. I'm getting nervous
about making the barrier breaker freeze, and we could use more
eyeballs and testing on hardware other than the wndr3800 in particular.

I don't read openwrt-devel all that much (too much traffic),
but I hope we would get some valid feedback on what to do to take
these packages further, and eventually into the openwrt mainline.

I generally use the gmane interface to it, e.g. I use a newsreader
or this interface to many lists like this:

http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.embedded.openwrt.devel

So I guess I should have cc'd the submittal to this list as
well, but since I didn't... those that care can subscribe or merely
watch gmane for a bit...

(I probably should read openwrt-devel more often...

I have been seeing some issues with dhcpv6 renews in the general case
and stumbled across this...

https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2014-March/024420.html
)

-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [Cerowrt-devel] SQM and BCP38 packages submitted for review at openwrt-devel
  2014-03-29 19:07 [Cerowrt-devel] SQM and BCP38 packages submitted for review at openwrt-devel Dave Taht
@ 2014-03-30 22:33 ` Dave Taht
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2014-03-30 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cerowrt-devel

On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have submitted the current sqm-scripts, luci-app-sqm, and bcp38
> packages as RFCs for openwrt's consideration. I'm getting nervous
> about making the barrier breaker freeze, and we could use more
> eyeballs and testing on hardware other than the wndr3800 in particular.
>
> I don't read openwrt-devel all that much (too much traffic),
> but I hope we would get some valid feedback on what to do to take
> these packages further, and eventually into the openwrt mainline.
>
> I generally use the gmane interface to it, e.g. I use a newsreader
> or this interface to many lists like this:
>
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.embedded.openwrt.devel
>
> So I guess I should have cc'd the submittal to this list as
> well, but since I didn't... those that care can subscribe or merely
> watch gmane for a bit...

I guess we should go and document all the sqm variables for
the command line folk:

https://www.mail-archive.com/openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org/msg22769.html

>
> (I probably should read openwrt-devel more often...
>
> I have been seeing some issues with dhcpv6 renews in the general case
> and stumbled across this...
>
> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2014-March/024420.html
> )
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html



-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-30 22:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-29 19:07 [Cerowrt-devel] SQM and BCP38 packages submitted for review at openwrt-devel Dave Taht
2014-03-30 22:33 ` Dave Taht

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox