From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98DF621F0BD for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 15:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cc10so2432934wib.16 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 15:33:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2yqdMIZLYlz+C5ivdSXNKE484NXBsAcOschFSDuoNY0=; b=pEhdTR22AL/uVcD1eVEUq7ItDblq5DqVNKSAowbYu9AjgD3qudtOehnoEGo4Ob7zQ8 hrn0vrfmkluV3p+/tHp1pxRoWWjXVf6BiNcmqCYCMI+D1abq903ANU5X7gH4yvr7NaUf RwHh7fLKoXxshXqCo1uXsH3YpVJRChifw++pY8pz+f8zWi6gn6n/bYj/AoA1VeC4YFwY yV1TnTht/nBXhAqs8XeNJ45pDKrvyjJ46N4KBzwWVtWtojKrrThg7OoY89xjSUfOw2Ia vyF3vNW1Syi6nj0xGEzT+mQZGkPtuV0S4gUhnYgqFQml0cau1EhGEq0yYeNu7mQqB5hv w0QQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.188.169 with SMTP id gb9mr7780301wic.17.1396218821709; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 15:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.8.1 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 15:33:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 15:33:41 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] SQM and BCP38 packages submitted for review at openwrt-devel X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 22:33:44 -0000 On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > I have submitted the current sqm-scripts, luci-app-sqm, and bcp38 > packages as RFCs for openwrt's consideration. I'm getting nervous > about making the barrier breaker freeze, and we could use more > eyeballs and testing on hardware other than the wndr3800 in particular. > > I don't read openwrt-devel all that much (too much traffic), > but I hope we would get some valid feedback on what to do to take > these packages further, and eventually into the openwrt mainline. > > I generally use the gmane interface to it, e.g. I use a newsreader > or this interface to many lists like this: > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.embedded.openwrt.devel > > So I guess I should have cc'd the submittal to this list as > well, but since I didn't... those that care can subscribe or merely > watch gmane for a bit... I guess we should go and document all the sqm variables for the command line folk: https://www.mail-archive.com/openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org/msg22769.html > > (I probably should read openwrt-devel more often... > > I have been seeing some issues with dhcpv6 renews in the general case > and stumbled across this... > > https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2014-March/024420.html > ) > > -- > Dave T=E4ht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscrib= e.html --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html