Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] debloating the Pi, maybe not.
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:43:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5FYhjbMFGJUOdZ=iRAvyDjYeVVQaZSZARnb6V6kChMBA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

I was donated a raspberry pi in cambridge and got it booted today.
It's a very cool
box, an arm6, running debian, with hard floating point, and getting a complete
development environment running, getting it to do mesh networking,
graphics, apache, etc, on a 16GB SD card, was a breeze.

But as for network performance:

It only comes up at 100Mbit, and as noted elsewhere the ethernet chip
is hooked up over USB.

dmesg

[3.078644] smsc95xx 1-1.1:1.0: eth0: register 'smsc95xx' at
usb-bcm2708_usb-1.1, smsc95xx USB 2.0 Ethernet, b8:27:eb:18:fc:ac

The best the 3.2 kernel based networking can do is about 75Mbit/sec.
This eats 68% of cpu in the "system" (sy in top) and 30% in si (system
interrupt)

I had had some hope of this being a good box to put some test tools on,
but with performance like this, I am back to leveraging the mips stuff.

That said, I do intend to poke at the driver and update to 3.6 when
I get a chance, since we have patches lying around for both this
chip and the usbnet code.

It does indeed bloat up under load, but not badly.

64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=49 ttl=64 time=0.625 ms

64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=0 ttl=64 time=4.184 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.421 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=2 ttl=64 time=5.707 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.843 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=4 ttl=64 time=6.142 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=5 ttl=64 time=6.026 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=6 ttl=64 time=2.373 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=7 ttl=64 time=13.746 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=8 ttl=64 time=3.296 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.699 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=10 ttl=64 time=2.948 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=11 ttl=64 time=12.975 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=12 ttl=64 time=4.238 ms


-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html

             reply	other threads:[~2012-11-23 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-23 16:43 Dave Taht [this message]
2012-11-26 15:10 ` Oliver Neukum
2012-11-26 15:29   ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw5FYhjbMFGJUOdZ=iRAvyDjYeVVQaZSZARnb6V6kChMBA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox