From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] debloating the Pi, maybe not.
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:43:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5FYhjbMFGJUOdZ=iRAvyDjYeVVQaZSZARnb6V6kChMBA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
I was donated a raspberry pi in cambridge and got it booted today.
It's a very cool
box, an arm6, running debian, with hard floating point, and getting a complete
development environment running, getting it to do mesh networking,
graphics, apache, etc, on a 16GB SD card, was a breeze.
But as for network performance:
It only comes up at 100Mbit, and as noted elsewhere the ethernet chip
is hooked up over USB.
dmesg
[3.078644] smsc95xx 1-1.1:1.0: eth0: register 'smsc95xx' at
usb-bcm2708_usb-1.1, smsc95xx USB 2.0 Ethernet, b8:27:eb:18:fc:ac
The best the 3.2 kernel based networking can do is about 75Mbit/sec.
This eats 68% of cpu in the "system" (sy in top) and 30% in si (system
interrupt)
I had had some hope of this being a good box to put some test tools on,
but with performance like this, I am back to leveraging the mips stuff.
That said, I do intend to poke at the driver and update to 3.6 when
I get a chance, since we have patches lying around for both this
chip and the usbnet code.
It does indeed bloat up under load, but not badly.
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=49 ttl=64 time=0.625 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=0 ttl=64 time=4.184 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.421 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=2 ttl=64 time=5.707 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.843 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=4 ttl=64 time=6.142 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=5 ttl=64 time=6.026 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=6 ttl=64 time=2.373 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=7 ttl=64 time=13.746 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=8 ttl=64 time=3.296 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.699 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=10 ttl=64 time=2.948 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=11 ttl=64 time=12.975 ms
64 bytes from 172.21.42.14: seq=12 ttl=64 time=4.238 ms
--
Dave Täht
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
next reply other threads:[~2012-11-23 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-23 16:43 Dave Taht [this message]
2012-11-26 15:10 ` Oliver Neukum
2012-11-26 15:29 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA93jw5FYhjbMFGJUOdZ=iRAvyDjYeVVQaZSZARnb6V6kChMBA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=oneukum@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox