Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: dpreed@reed.com
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] stanford talk/deluged in hardware/yurtlab
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:47:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5HrwdzBNaxZ7j1AeOGK-Xxpj_96yzYP-qnSQQVoS8LNQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359940294.947925589@apps.rackspace.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4331 bytes --]

Darn I wish I'd made it to that show today.

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:11 PM, <dpreed@reed.com> wrote:

> http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/2/prweb9154394.htm (10 GigE FMC card)
>
>
 impressive. Seems to require a hpc (high pin count) board, which zed isn't.


> http://www.xilinx.com/products/boards-and-kits/1-2AJPAV.htm (1 GiGE FMC
> card)
>

625 eu. While I am painfully aware of how much it costs to step ahead of
the bleeding edge, I think the odds are pointing harder and harder at doing
a non-fpga design that does what I want...

I may go back to looking at octeons or ti's new octeon killer.

And/or leveraging a newer atheros reference board.


>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2013 1:39pm
> To: dpreed@reed.com
> Cc: "Mark Constable" <markc@renta.net>,
> cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] stanford talk/deluged in hardware/yurtlab
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:26 AM, <dpreed@reed.com> wrote:
>
>> It would be trivial to do this with a Zedboard.
>>
>
> Well, need two network ports. Haven't figured out much on interfacing the
> thing to offboard gear (I'd have liked it if it had a pci interface). So is
> interfacing up a second network card "trivial" on the I/Os provided?
>
> And wanted esata, or some high speed disk I/O interface for captures.
>
> I'd rather like to continue forward on the zedboard front. The prospect of
> designing an ethernet chip that actually could incorporate fq_codel etc is
> very exciting. The RGII interface is available to access directly, in
> particular.
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2013 1:17pm
>> To: "Mark Constable" <markc@renta.net>
>> Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] stanford talk/deluged in hardware/yurtlab
>>
>>  Well, I see it for 320. Then you need to add a SSD, and a decent
>> network card, and I suppose it could be made to work. Awful big, tho, in an
>> era where I can get 1/2TB on an 2.5 inch SSD.
>>
>> What I'd wanted was closer to a dreamplug - 160 bucks, two network ports,
>> but with an internal SSD. bonus points if it fit into a 1U rack and ate as
>> little power as possible.
>>
>> Principal use case here is to be a "network monitor" with enough oomph to
>> run stuff like cacti/mrtg/snmp tools, as well as do captures off of a
>> mirrored switch port.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mark Constable <markc@renta.net>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2013-02-03 09:18am, Dave Taht wrote:
>>>> > I'm grumpy, as it doesn't have an esata interface internally,
>>>> apparently.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.google.com?q=HP+N40L+MicroServer
>>>>
>>>> I know this is no where near an embedded device but I just got one of
>>>> these
>>>> on sale (new model out) for $220 and I think it's the most useful
>>>> all-round
>>>> cheap server box I've ever seen. Some people have it running 16 GB ram
>>>> and
>>>> I've got mine booting off an SSD via external eSATA. Very well built
>>>> with 2
>>>> x half height PCI slots (4 x eth port card?). Only missing USB3 ports
>>>> and
>>>> hot-swap drive space. And, very quiet with just an SSD.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd be very interested to know how fast it could do packet header
>>> captures.
>>>
>>> Line rate (gigE) would be good.
>>>
>>> Does it do BQL? (what is the onboard ethernet chips)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>>>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Täht
>>>
>>> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
>>> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Täht
>>
>> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
>> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
>



-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7768 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-04  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-03 17:18 Dave Taht
2013-02-03 18:03 ` Mark Constable
2013-02-03 18:10   ` Dave Taht
2013-02-03 18:17     ` Dave Taht
2013-02-03 18:26       ` dpreed
2013-02-03 18:39         ` Dave Taht
2013-02-04  1:11           ` dpreed
2013-02-04  1:47             ` Dave Taht [this message]
2013-02-04 16:41               ` dpreed
2013-02-04  6:09       ` Mark Constable
2013-02-04  6:29         ` Dave Taht
2013-02-04 10:07           ` Mark Constable
2013-02-03 18:24     ` Maciej Soltysiak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA93jw5HrwdzBNaxZ7j1AeOGK-Xxpj_96yzYP-qnSQQVoS8LNQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dpreed@reed.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox