From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B636D21F2B5 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obctg8 with SMTP id tg8so7476913obc.3 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:40:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RhPXBvRiFjDhBL7h4KfwFuYnmXy/QqvmA4F8eBhc/KE=; b=i0Qg3M6kdx6U0dYkzgm9hb66YD8V8OHqOf6m0WRRuN6zfYeik3bnTUjoPA6dT+/e4f ymm/lnrzgjn1NuTkW7MvzWMGcweqdl9MlDoRCf/j9RwEs04snXQLDsshgInqsRBOieQ5 a7KYAI4caaNfxwNWFv6YPHyLMuYFhDzGLBCDp8iWa2fI6LOcB02gVSElGNCW9YQU7H6m NB8RirVX92tv/CDnCkDTzIfJ9betHzmbpOXQnqWr5vOkErkuajqpSR85A+3g6swXJ0Fg 7K0R41oPPhdkxLRxTAejyv1o6UwUrllraURro6rlqHxnkBoLWd+5wsRBIlxUi8vDe8yM 2u9g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.91.212 with SMTP id p203mr28089337oib.108.1435070402471; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.105.129 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:40:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <26463A88-821B-44B7-A728-64BCB0B7C7BB@gmx.de> <55847E32.9000405@gmail.com> <5584823E.4040207@gmail.com> <0129B5FB-9D1B-45FF-84CA-492A6A0B638B@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:40:02 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Jim Reisert AD1C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:40:32 -0000 On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > >> Most likely not. Check http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/sqm. >> Rich published a great set of instructions for setting up sqm-scripts un= der OpenWRT proper. > > Thanks, Sebastian. I did as you suggested. > > It was eye-opening looking at the results from > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest both before and after enabling > SQM. Wow! I think one of the most effective graphs we ever did was the "you are here. You could be here." one. I would like to add it to this: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat?up=3D1 > > - Jim > > -- > Jim Reisert AD1C, , http://www.ad1c.us --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast