Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Cc: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] atomic route updates?
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 02:56:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5K3xo1Sp5JGf9pWaFbUOCdO0nwW8KqFG5En=qk28kKxA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

iproute2's ip/iproute2.c code has a function called iproute_modify,
which to a blurring eye appears to be capable of doing an atomic route
update via it's netlink interface.

"        if (matches(*argv, "change") == 0 || strcmp(*argv, "chg") == 0)
                return iproute_modify(RTM_NEWROUTE, NLM_F_REPLACE,
                                      argc-1, argv+1);
        if (matches(*argv, "replace") == 0)
                return iproute_modify(RTM_NEWROUTE, NLM_F_CREATE|NLM_F_REPLACE,
                                      argc-1, argv+1);"

The babel  native daemon and the quagga-re code, however, does a
delete/add, which results in packets dropping on the floor when a
route changes.

Everyone that's tried to make this code do atomic updates has failed.

Juliusz thinks this section of the codebase is cursed, and I
personally, gave up, because dave miller had spent most of the last 3+
years eliminating the linux kernel route cache, (which was finally
eliminated a few kernel versions back (3.6?)) and I figured all
attempts at doing anything fancy with routing during that phase was
going to break in odd ways until the new cache-free-linux-kernel
routing code stabilized.

OK, so, like, it's kernel 3.8 time now, and ...  I find myself too
scarred by previous attempts to give it a go myself, but I know that
out there are intrepid explorers out there, just dying to delve into
the gnarly details of netlink programming to keep a few more streams
going full throttle in the face of a routing change! Yes? Anyone? So
take a look at iproute2 and the relevant netlink code here:

git://github.com/Quagga-RE/quagga-RE.git
git://github.com/jech/babeld.git

I note that I have a few other ideas for netlink-related changes to
cero. Two of the big ones is that I'd like to be able to have a
userspace daemon get back more details as to when *fq_codel drops a
packet (e.g, send a multicast to a listener of the dropped the packet,
and why), and get some sort of ongoing bandwidth estimate when it
starts dropping, etc.

I also have some hope for multi-prefix multi-homed routing too...

but I find netlink really intimidating. It has an interface that only
a bit-banger would love.

-- 
Dave Täht

PS: I have a build of 3.8.8 at the moment that uses the new PROCD
replacement for init that I'm losing a battle on, too. Also toke has
got cero mostly independently buildable now.

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html

             reply	other threads:[~2013-04-20  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-20  9:56 Dave Taht [this message]
2013-04-24  6:14 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2013-04-24  9:33   ` Dave Taht
2013-04-24 13:27 ` Robert Bradley
2013-04-24 14:03   ` Robert Bradley
2013-04-24 15:46   ` Dave Taht
2013-04-25 15:05     ` Robert Bradley
2013-05-05 12:02       ` Dave Taht
2013-05-05 13:58         ` Daniel Ezell
2013-05-05 18:31           ` Dave Taht
2013-05-05 17:01         ` Robert Bradley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw5K3xo1Sp5JGf9pWaFbUOCdO0nwW8KqFG5En=qk28kKxA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=jch@pps.jussieu.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox