From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com (mail-bk0-f43.google.com [209.85.214.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1037E200629 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:46:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by bkbzv3 with SMTP id zv3so1264731bkb.16 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:46:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4lYKADwOnXB6iYXYqVhPvVVVkzm1FDKMiMEINwwDQ5Q=; b=sUWfVjLlUIBDkYe4Ja8c/kiWXvHlXqEmPg4IEgd2YbAp8e84VErtYqBDbePbD6VLy4 yxFAHsoH7PKEdeU+ni9OGrtoGM2ux5wqfK6cnL9CDlp/wCfwhEDA3Aq15C/5+g/xP+we sw6HMj6NTs46swt2TogDAcJfI9xU+GFrWajeI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.131.13 with SMTP id ho13mr12474162bkc.58.1328075201157; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:46:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.67.76 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:46:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5F266E79-F0B7-4204-ADE0-0DF3735ECD7E@intermapper.com> References: <24CB9DCF-5C60-491E-9007-ACDC5833915C@intermapper.com> <5F266E79-F0B7-4204-ADE0-0DF3735ECD7E@intermapper.com> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:46:41 +0100 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Richard Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] bql-27 smoketest released, with... BQL, SFQRED, etc X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:46:45 -0000 please note that I AM putting regular builds up in bql-smoketests but unless I announce them here, I'd advise steering clear... On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Richard Brown wrote: > Dave, > >> I note that the default AQM is rather lame now. I am working on a >> replacement,and gui for it, but won't be done for at least a week. >> PLEASE feel free to try it as is... > > OK. Thanks. > >>> - Does the Onboard Documentation >>> (http://jupiter.lab.bufferbloat.net/cerowrt/about.html) accurately refl= ect >>> what is in the bql-27 build? (The Read This First page asserts this.) >> >> I have no idea right now. > > I understand. The worst part is that the main About... page refers to Oce= an City. Perhaps the last two paragraphs should simply say, To me 'Ocean City' was the rc6 build. Mentally 'Paris' is the upcoming build. I would like to get away from the 'rc' nomenclature. I'm open to a new naming and numbering scheme for sure. > > --- > This is a stable build of the bql series of CeroWrt from February 2012. F= or more information on CeroWrt, please see the "CeroWrt Wiki":http://www.bu= fferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki > --- > >> We need to take a major pass through the onboard doc >> (I'd like better css on that too), but I have assiduously >> resisted making any big decisions regarding the final >> core feature set until now, and I don't want to >> think about doc until that settles down. >> >> I only have two 'features' left to add - and that's dhcp6-pd support >> and better ipv6 support overall. I'd like to implement rfc4193 >> support,AND get that working on gw.home.lan as well. >> >> Then there is the gui and aqm work... > > Great. > >>> - Would it be possible to get fprobe added into the bql-27 packages? >> >> Sorry, I had to rebase that build (again) and hadn't >> checked the new package database into the build tree. >> >> fprobe or fprobe-ulog? I'll build both but only want >> to include one. > > fprobe is fine. OK, added in my messy builds, and will be there permanently in the future. > >> I am not planning a truly working new build or package set >> for a week or so, either, sorrry. > > That's OK. >> >>> >>> - When I'm looking at the web GUI, I have a hard time remembering which >>> build I was using e.g., r29957 for the bql-27 build. As a workaround, i= t >>> might be enough to include the build number =A0somewhere (as a file nam= e?) in >>> the download directory. >>> (http://huchra.bufferbloat.net/~cero1/bql-smoketests/bql-27/) >> >> I will start writing /etc/openwrt-version in the next builds. > > Perfect. > >> I note that the bql series is just that (and it took me 23 attempts to >> eventually get bql working), and it isn't tied >> to a rc, or plan, at all. It was my way of dismissing the >> externalities and fixing bufferbloat more than anything else. >> >> While I was doing that, nearly all the fixes required to meet >> rc7's original feature plan arrived... > > There is so much noise about rc7 & rc8 in the wiki/site. Perhaps it's bet= ter simply to jump to a name/version not already mentioned? yes, see above. suggestions welcomed. > > I also note that a lot of the stuff from the wiki could be promoted to th= e Overview, Roadmap, and Activity, and News parts of the main CeroWrt site.= .. I'm happy to do that but don't have access right now. > > Thanks! > > Rich > --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 FR Tel: 0638645374 http://www.bufferbloat.net