[Cerowrt-devel] WRT1900AC support finally in OpenWRT -> New Cero Dev platform?

[Cerowrt-devel] WRT1900AC support finally in OpenWRT -> New Cero Dev platform?

[Aaron Wood]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 452 bytes --]

So it appears that Marvell pushed a bunch of patches to OpenWRT on
Christmas, and as a result, trunk OpenWRT (kernel 3.18) can run, and run
pretty well, on the 1900AC.

https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=258634#p258634

dual-core 1.2GHz ARM.  Given my experience with processors like the iMX 6,
this should be light-years ahead of the WNDR3800 in terms of CPU
performance.  Perhaps this will let the sqm scripts go well above 100Mbps?

-Aaron

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 625 bytes --]

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] WRT1900AC support finally in OpenWRT -> New Cero Dev platform?

[Joel Wirāmu Pauling]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 853 bytes --]

Do those patches include Broadcom wireless AC support for mainline or
wireless-next or is it still a Wireless free 'open' wireless router?
On Jan 7, 2015 8:13 PM, "Aaron Wood" <woody77@gmail.com> wrote:

> So it appears that Marvell pushed a bunch of patches to OpenWRT on
> Christmas, and as a result, trunk OpenWRT (kernel 3.18) can run, and run
> pretty well, on the 1900AC.
>
> https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=258634#p258634
>
> dual-core 1.2GHz ARM.  Given my experience with processors like the iMX 6,
> this should be light-years ahead of the WNDR3800 in terms of CPU
> performance.  Perhaps this will let the sqm scripts go well above 100Mbps?
>
> -Aaron
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1427 bytes --]

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] WRT1900AC support finally in OpenWRT -> New Cero Dev platform?

[Dave Taht]

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com> wrote:
> So it appears that Marvell pushed a bunch of patches to OpenWRT on
> Christmas, and as a result, trunk OpenWRT (kernel 3.18) can run, and run
> pretty well, on the 1900AC.
>
> https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=258634#p258634

The rest of that thread was not particularly encouraging.

I don't have at 1900AC. I do have the netgear X4 sitting on a shelf
awaiting better support.

> dual-core 1.2GHz ARM.  Given my experience with processors like the iMX 6,
> this should be light-years ahead of the WNDR3800 in terms of CPU
> performance.  Perhaps this will let the sqm scripts go well above 100Mbps?

as the sqm-scripts work well on even the lowest end modern x86 system,
I will argue that what is needed is mostly larger caches on the arms.
Over the holidays I snagged a bunch of arm based platforms to (I'd
hoped) more easily test (with decent flash and memory)

xgene: boots, the root password is not published, then the serial port
went flaky
u-droid U1: got two, both boot, get an IP, then crash 3 seconds later, no logs
                 even though there are 4 A5 cores, SMP support doesn't
work yet in linux
u-droid U3: doesn't even boot
radxa rock-lite (Seems to need uboot and linux flashed from a special utility)
(the rock2 seemed promising)

My enthusiasm for hacking on teeny little boxes was subsequently
dimmed, and I went back to wrestling with vivado and the paralllelas.

If anybody in the bay area wants to try to bring up any of these boxes
to usefulness,
I will gladly make christmas presents of them and hand deliver.

>
> -Aaron
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>



-- 
Dave Täht

thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks