From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A85B121F199 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:56:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a3so8440908oib.11 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:56:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MAyrex16J0F1aRqt9qnw5Il7vDiUaKeOChZmtfNdOUg=; b=tlNVpse4nlWZnFSZu3IlTLkBZq/HPf59ZWUTpSdHPy9+wrdEVwUbgfH71IggzNHELJ Qqz+fHBBLNlXUc56ZpdSC1nbOPlhSzmq/f6lTbw6zYBOwpwOyRXO/umxZsCfOXsCTG72 ufzWk5TjUcDA3H2steG7ad+9d1xMtED3FKVhzUkLNMe1qb7LS2UXEap/Ye59bBQRijBj VjXGhnBl/WBHQuKPMp76vXtqP1dzci+bjbVgJgbnXdSSJTPshajFUuqoEQW0PCT5nX9J H+Pp7ZRGj2miJi4Kso6e2pZVVndutqomVksHLtoDFlXurZN93WUH6CDmgljJilTJyJvW qD4w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.241.133 with SMTP id wi5mr6473010obc.10.1420739798483; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:56:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.169.209 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:56:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:56:38 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Aaron Wood Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] WRT1900AC support finally in OpenWRT -> New Cero Dev platform? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:57:08 -0000 On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Aaron Wood wrote: > So it appears that Marvell pushed a bunch of patches to OpenWRT on > Christmas, and as a result, trunk OpenWRT (kernel 3.18) can run, and run > pretty well, on the 1900AC. > > https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3D258634#p258634 The rest of that thread was not particularly encouraging. I don't have at 1900AC. I do have the netgear X4 sitting on a shelf awaiting better support. > dual-core 1.2GHz ARM. Given my experience with processors like the iMX 6= , > this should be light-years ahead of the WNDR3800 in terms of CPU > performance. Perhaps this will let the sqm scripts go well above 100Mbps= ? as the sqm-scripts work well on even the lowest end modern x86 system, I will argue that what is needed is mostly larger caches on the arms. Over the holidays I snagged a bunch of arm based platforms to (I'd hoped) more easily test (with decent flash and memory) xgene: boots, the root password is not published, then the serial port went flaky u-droid U1: got two, both boot, get an IP, then crash 3 seconds later, no l= ogs even though there are 4 A5 cores, SMP support doesn't work yet in linux u-droid U3: doesn't even boot radxa rock-lite (Seems to need uboot and linux flashed from a special utili= ty) (the rock2 seemed promising) My enthusiasm for hacking on teeny little boxes was subsequently dimmed, and I went back to wrestling with vivado and the paralllelas. If anybody in the bay area wants to try to bring up any of these boxes to usefulness, I will gladly make christmas presents of them and hand deliver. > > -Aaron > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks