From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 456DC21F2D6 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:20:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id wm4so74704obc.12 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:20:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1KKSNfuKpqWSWGAtx4NCz3uNNs5VhC3zpytPCvAUgbc=; b=AyMev+SNCTvWEs7Fgn1yagLrRU2S7YEhSv1OnkV8ze9/U4kkerDRanYRus+DyHA94T 4zihG3brT1hbIRtnxpLyimD1GiJT9pmonx/91Im4Z1SYo6Gz7EcF09gEGbTi7s0W+kct jmv3M1DKgihCZ77FCXhXLMzzuBkSjc9lqSCUafEHGZ2qK7DBXgSmVpqH2fSq8aCbxAc/ /vGh1w+3Ss3o1chWdw83/LYBZ53m+kU7Ea5VUoI5vnHDYPXlbBFmm20rsV4Ll2U8v/GY Dz6Z1lVjcYsNu6FBj2QP32zR/ZeLOILx01Er+JGwuyTXeatImULTgndeAC+XW3t06Ogp bcuQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.141.35 with SMTP id rl3mr52614234oeb.43.1412140847310; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.227.76 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:20:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87lhp4540a.fsf@toke.dk> References: <87lhp4540a.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:20:47 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] how's everybody's uptime? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 05:21:17 -0000 Could y'all check your instruction traps? Also check for space on flash periodically. Hopefully we're not writing flash anywhere, either. I note that once upon a time we had a dhcpv6 bug that only struck every 55 days, and if we get past that point, we're finally in stable territory... ... except for all the little bugs like pim that have cropped up. On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > Dave Taht writes: > >> I have thus far been delighted in the stability of 3.10.50-1, how's it >> working for all of you? > > Very good. Two main gateways running tunnelled IPv6 and authoritative > DNS; one with unencrypted wifi and no guest network, another with > Freeradius and 802.11i authentication on the encrypted network. Both > running without issue (other than what I've caused myself by tinkering) > for ~50 days. > > Also, the second box distributes routes to a secondary router over > babel, which is also very stable; including automatic failover when the > wireless bridge between the buildings fails (which again mostly happens > when I tinker with it...). Bridging the wifi interfaces to a secondary > router with VLAN interconnect between the two routes also works well. > > All in all, very happy with the stability of this release and quite > impressed with the feature set. Big thumbs up! :) > > -Toke --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/make-wifi-fast