while I am grumping: https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/NyW5HQusMMw It has been a bad day. On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Sebastian Moeller > wrote: > >> Hi Felix, hi List, >> >> >> On Jan 25, 2015, at 12:09 , Felix Fietkau wrote: >> >> > Here's another candidate: >> > >> http://us.dlink.com/products/connect/wireless-ac1200-dual-band-gigabit-cloud-router-dir-860l/ >> >> > I just ordered one of these to play with. I am otherwise quite depressed > about how the home gateway industry arbitrarily switches out products and > software with the same brand for something else, usually inferior. > > Today´s news: > http://forums.dlink.com/index.php?topic=61634.msg250538#msg250538 > > >> > CPU: MT7621 (dual-core MIPS, 880 MHz, 4 virtual CPUs) >> > The device has preliminary OpenWrt support already. In my tests, handles >> > ~820 Mbit/s NAT without any special acceleration features (with >> fq_codel, >> > no shaping). Haven't done any tests with shaping yet. >> > Wifi (MT7612E) is still buggy with my mt76 driver, but I'll fix that in >> > March when I get back from vacation. >> > >> > - Felix >> >> I am currently searching for a replacement for my wndr3700v2 as >> it is running out of steam on my temporary 100/40 Mbps link. This thing >> looks quite decent, but I notice between >> https://wikidevi.com/wiki/D-Link_DIR-860L_rev_A1 and >> https://wikidevi.com/wiki/D-Link_DIR-860L_rev_B1 that d-link reused the >> sam name for quite different hardware implementations, and only the more >> recent B1 revision will work for us. (Is it just me or do you also find >> this tendency to not even add the revision to the official name a bit >> annoying?) >> So, does anybody here now how to order a specific revision in >> Germany? Or is the only way to wait a bit and hope the A1 revision clears >> the retail channel so only B1’s are left? I notice that from looking at the >> internal photos for both devices posted on the FCC site that the old A1 >> Broadcom revision has its USB port "above" the ethernet ports while the B1 >> Mediatek revision has the USB port between DC in and below the ethernet >> ports. Am I correct in assuming that deployed hardware needs to match the >> FCC design exactly (that is, in case of revision a new FCC submission with >> new photos is required)? >> >> Best Regards >> Sebastian > > > > > -- > Dave Täht > > thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks > -- Dave Täht thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks