From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com (mail-ob0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DE2C21F2E6 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:38:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id wo20so62199902obc.5 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:38:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=t7ha1EYgHuKPgVwTa/wrYfMU/UbjjIPzBdGLj0mbZRo=; b=uMr+EOoo020HUKkWyIe+Rb2y0UrYuN+R/3sGh+NYbtGllUSjcUi7D29QirzDsVVwbp foREnu1zeowx/SbgU8MCLGaqXB69J6uwbMGs3nVqDudCBApnirWv3XKxTj3wmI8Y0N49 c5jAnm2XFPwTXupA8OSPbdfghHuppRIuhJkWgan6pc8VvDfCu6rlAi4Z+BfNov+cOsFV QmRN/K0hyz+P+NwoSKrwpwlzzPQ/txc5YS8TeihB/LuVHFI9TtYGc4Q/0ByfQDnQvnr2 XulE5o6yoyZ3tDzwX+d39Md78SjzVSbkbSPkJfGC1BqxRlFpH+lI0mOysPOMNelSP43M 7khw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.16.230 with SMTP id j6mr21267778oed.8.1424252317045; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:38:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.51.66 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:38:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <63C60796-0C39-474C-B5A4-F2FCACC4592A@gmx.de> <54C4CEE3.2040909@openwrt.org> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:38:36 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Sebastian Moeller Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f503bb26d9b27050f5995b2 Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] another contender for WNDR replacement X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:39:06 -0000 --e89a8f503bb26d9b27050f5995b2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable while I am grumping: https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/NyW5HQusMMw It has been a bad day. On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Sebastian Moeller > wrote: > >> Hi Felix, hi List, >> >> >> On Jan 25, 2015, at 12:09 , Felix Fietkau wrote: >> >> > Here's another candidate: >> > >> http://us.dlink.com/products/connect/wireless-ac1200-dual-band-gigabit-c= loud-router-dir-860l/ >> >> > I just ordered one of these to play with. I am otherwise quite depressed > about how the home gateway industry arbitrarily switches out products and > software with the same brand for something else, usually inferior. > > Today=C2=B4s news: > http://forums.dlink.com/index.php?topic=3D61634.msg250538#msg250538 > > >> > CPU: MT7621 (dual-core MIPS, 880 MHz, 4 virtual CPUs) >> > The device has preliminary OpenWrt support already. In my tests, handl= es >> > ~820 Mbit/s NAT without any special acceleration features (with >> fq_codel, >> > no shaping). Haven't done any tests with shaping yet. >> > Wifi (MT7612E) is still buggy with my mt76 driver, but I'll fix that i= n >> > March when I get back from vacation. >> > >> > - Felix >> >> I am currently searching for a replacement for my wndr3700v2 as >> it is running out of steam on my temporary 100/40 Mbps link. This thing >> looks quite decent, but I notice between >> https://wikidevi.com/wiki/D-Link_DIR-860L_rev_A1 and >> https://wikidevi.com/wiki/D-Link_DIR-860L_rev_B1 that d-link reused the >> sam name for quite different hardware implementations, and only the more >> recent B1 revision will work for us. (Is it just me or do you also find >> this tendency to not even add the revision to the official name a bit >> annoying?) >> So, does anybody here now how to order a specific revision in >> Germany? Or is the only way to wait a bit and hope the A1 revision clear= s >> the retail channel so only B1=E2=80=99s are left? I notice that from loo= king at the >> internal photos for both devices posted on the FCC site that the old A1 >> Broadcom revision has its USB port "above" the ethernet ports while the = B1 >> Mediatek revision has the USB port between DC in and below the ethernet >> ports. Am I correct in assuming that deployed hardware needs to match th= e >> FCC design exactly (that is, in case of revision a new FCC submission wi= th >> new photos is required)? >> >> Best Regards >> Sebastian > > > > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > > thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks --e89a8f503bb26d9b27050f5995b2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

=

= On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de><= /span> wrote:
Hi Felix= , hi List,


On Jan 25, 2015, at 12:09 , Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> wrote:

> Here's another candidate:
> http://us.dlink.com/p= roducts/connect/wireless-ac1200-dual-band-gigabit-cloud-router-dir-860l/

=C2=A0
> CPU: MT7621 (dual-core MIPS, 880 MHz, 4 virtual CPUs)
> The device has preliminary OpenWrt support already. In my tests, handl= es
> ~820 Mbit/s NAT without any special acceleration features (with fq_cod= el,
> no shaping). Haven't done any tests with shaping yet.
> Wifi (MT7612E) is still buggy with my mt76 driver, but I'll fix th= at in
> March when I get back from vacation.
>
> - Felix

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 I am currently searching for a repl= acement for my wndr3700v2 as it is running out of steam on my temporary 100= /40 Mbps link. This thing looks quite decent, but I notice between htt= ps://wikidevi.com/wiki/D-Link_DIR-860L_rev_A1 and https://wikidevi.= com/wiki/D-Link_DIR-860L_rev_B1 that d-link reused the sam name for qui= te different hardware implementations, and only the more recent B1 revision= will work for us. (Is it just me or do you also find this tendency to not = even add the revision to the official name a bit annoying?)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 So, does anybody here now how to order a specif= ic revision in Germany? Or is the only way to wait a bit and hope the A1 re= vision clears the retail channel so only B1=E2=80=99s are left? I notice th= at from looking at the internal photos for both devices posted on the FCC s= ite that the old A1 Broadcom revision has its USB port "above" th= e ethernet ports while the B1 Mediatek revision has the USB port between DC= in and below the ethernet ports. Am I correct in assuming that deployed ha= rdware needs to match the FCC design exactly (that is, in case of revision = a new FCC submission with new photos is required)?

Best Regards
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Sebastian<= /span>



= --



--
Dave T=C3=A4ht

thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/= projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks
--e89a8f503bb26d9b27050f5995b2--