From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B44B21F1DA for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:36:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e131so426153oig.38 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:36:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qhAtGh2CqD8PpuC/m0KWpyK8dBVRdd69txu2/yvGH5k=; b=Mw1AWRRrRuU7AN68afyh3tsuMELpXyC8bpGGS+kBAOE80dQePgXO0uazGwCqwBrs06 bwTIxxM0/CTG+xE2KEWYxeTbTKa/VOrT+IYNSq+XS9LP0+bNE3+zuu8zFGXTIl4qtQe3 LQljK0jUYV69GbP/zbBYyZ1RWXubjTNbybYTI1Z7AlKtjOxa1D1fvQ4Odmr/3fZWQ+47 eE8rsZbFkamN+b5o/pWkOaOZ+hfGl4muRfW3n7JwzakUUjE4tkU1rZODdrQ32v76m0iE 0wAHLE7XqGKPFM54t2eC+e70qgXIV92NEQ5+f+wCimyBqLbK5ilZKlWS8Y2KQY0a900K UgdA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.178.144 with SMTP id cy16mr1075227oec.60.1414244187668; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.227.211 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:36:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4186.1414173172@sandelman.ca> <17166.1414176875@sandelman.ca> Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 06:36:27 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Maciej Soltysiak Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Available MACs in dropbear X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:36:57 -0000 I'd argue more in favor of updating to the latest dropbear, pulled anyway. On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Maciej Soltysiak wr= ote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Michael Richardson wr= ote: >> >> Maciej Soltysiak wrote: >> >> The reason why it hurts me is that I have servers configured >> >> according to bettercrypto.org and I can't connect from cero (rare >> >> occasions, but >> >> >> >> 1) MD5 !=3D HMAC-MD5. >> > That I didn't know, thanks Michael. For some reason bettercrypto.o= rg >> >> Yeah, people get very excited over pattern matching of crypto algorithms= . > Well, that may be the case. Here though, I'm more interested in introduci= ng > HMAC-SHA2s, than eradicating HMAC-MD5 as my setups wouldn't allow it anyw= ay. > > Anyway, Dave, here's the pull request: > https://github.com/dtaht/cerowrt-3.10/pull/1 > And here's the commit I'm suggesting: > https://github.com/pysiak/cerowrt-3.10/commit/3cac2227700561272e3476f5683= 18c42975bc813 > > The request is to patch a patch unfortunately :-) > > Can you have a look, please? > Maciej Soltysiak > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks