From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E6C3B2A2 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 14:30:45 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id n204so326826456qke.2 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:30:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1Xy5GYIzciJrCHhub8WU/z0aaYdK1iuf/r++Ig9uAHo=; b=ne1r34lja4qTMVMW86B01lRdorUXu6L5zMJmrvUyFGJv9hB9QnE5xF99Bf6DrlJIuz m3cOtcv/S35nNSLCgHYqZoLhyXfwpxQ+Z8MejagMaKuj97JL5ZL9tkebYdSRKk1+6dGZ Tsi13QqNZlt0mwmJBAvOlswFNFYieApeviFOyLIRqUnvN0FQIvVi4l+JPoxhRC6PO/Xw sPm0Icb5y4WIVFLmXoB3Rg7BU7z21uJ7PFMbWL8M3O++zO/82RbFZmflVtcWCddT2ofH 0Tz5rMYcrxSyhzFiWlLO+S0Hr3qhuGX0vfbIExpHOH+FIhae1x3vQKiCgYHGT2q7VKoL Sh9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1Xy5GYIzciJrCHhub8WU/z0aaYdK1iuf/r++Ig9uAHo=; b=Z8/wvMVI5YKxzVk+OuRHoQBOw7vdvhC2uzu9wjk1EuWM2b+Y1spd2ehtc1f8G+/D3J 9AW1T56om/A+X8HZT5fMuSSPXamN4hvTRXPhtwFGB6jFtEPQea+rWf/dBjrCeacP7Znv d9vF5YGI509SyTbQ7wsU/BNg4tOaUAT/q7U0uHF4RaDmvzS9ltM7Qm4HARwuqXO+KruB KhI0Imf1sIhoAKr7MIvnCXaqLO3tXBT4MxaKXBNFJ3EvGGpQJtwzkCApwI5lF+L2+FPy bPDQv+aUn1UR58sFleUpj+qUAi6YgVqWFcnORUVSXSrXVjSx59jSA5Ct5rtgY9Lp0WQl TfRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02vSMg2wv7rlAxeqb5PpwHUsNCGD4aYtQ1eV4tLjga+0B3iTv48CdSVSRTpuzZaQ344kaU7fqdvCRqFXQ== X-Received: by 10.55.221.29 with SMTP id n29mr14209884qki.114.1479670244665; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:30:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.137.198 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:30:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dave Taht Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:30:44 -0800 Message-ID: To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] linksys 1200ac lockout problem still exists X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:30:45 -0000 Has the omnia got this problem? On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > so, in a flood of optimism, I reflashed my linksys 1200ac with lede head. > > If you hit it with more than one download flow in netperf(flent), all > successor flows still starve. > > http://www.taht.net/~d/linksys1200aclockout.png > > I was under the impression a fix (also adding BQL) had arrived for > this problem in mainline. > > filed a bug on it just now, I should have done so long ago. > > https://bugs.lede-project.org/index.php?do=3Ddetails&task_id=3D294 > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! > http://blog.cerowrt.org --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org