From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x234.google.com (mail-ob0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8F563B2A0 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 09:56:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ob0-x234.google.com with SMTP id kf9so7376787obc.1 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 06:56:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mxgkeDMIHMdTv4iAqdmON7f1TyCpVzwZ720jaHzdj+Y=; b=FkaGiR/hn1+Wsa12B7iv630HTw+1FlcXy0fCMRbTMiRPN3CDyU/3TJtFLTFOZtXgQb nXYS+cuMdBiNjEGbTU6hgNF64Gsqs95BFaQ2UQxHTBnwS7gdNG/qMWCdkUtum2MwLOM+ Y3C0Czx8xQGwe1LSdbibhmkqo5ByRx+KbDa7oIg6k/8koV3Qyph6F1GuH4BtJTt88IMu P78Hd213bT6PuIs5upbhEb2HY/Pg3z3ibhrJ788eEimGf3rt4oIlm2SANN580DoGSXvE rqCKX2kuwdTnT7jeNyDwi0BjHd7BUp/9BWrN52N9xnMNzTHuxEuoQ7QB30NA1ETJahdH 3w6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mxgkeDMIHMdTv4iAqdmON7f1TyCpVzwZ720jaHzdj+Y=; b=GCYSkiLB3TnGX2w3Y7sfN2egageaH/X5AtRHuRtY2W5zA7NQMrTcStxFRSTFHed9/Q VV7Irv4AGoaDHdw+OSg3GwSCB+tIxaG5D4X0adNK6H7I8UGnWSN6JKAamVlyq2FKxKep f42xgRuUVQaWleiwWgDkhU0Gdj5riZVMcEFPtdMuJs5kdX4vTQ3QpVvHPZUYDwSGIUHW ZwfKMN56mEhIae98TWteyBw/JaNW8LQOzub8XQzU/NuxwswsFKPMX/I1bOJuAViHf6F2 sNxnjkp2nmh2HoXrKXwPRBBf1QoDtLqR7HxzOB9VnEaDjiwY91Gna36B7VXHMgNen0pb Dw/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKWNGF8odmv44W9E/EURI/9gjzKN5FgtSW8H0a2LCK/nV74gFaxgWVEw5gaPYQn27ZQY3gGnaH9VwhNjA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.39.194 with SMTP id r2mr1602561oek.69.1458741410446; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 06:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.168.129 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 06:56:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8760wduxad.fsf@toke.dk> References: <8760wduxad.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 06:56:50 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] is there an html expert in the house? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:56:59 -0000 On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > Dave Taht writes: > >> The sidebar, flush right, (to heck with these huge margins) and of a fix= ed size. >> The content flush left and for it to resize the flow of the text and >> the graphs to fit, no matter the size of the content portion. > > Pushed fixes to this to the blog-cerowrt repo. Kept the feature where > the sidebar moves to the bottom if the browser window is less that 992 > px wide - otherwise it's going to look horrible on mobiles :) Thx, man. That's exactly what I wanted. http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/rtt_fair_on_wifi/ looks great now. (do have to revise the text some). I realize that I'm a throwback, but I remember fondly an era where browsers only took up a part of our screens, and useful productive tools for creating stuff - like emacs, inkscape, test tools, chat, and other applications occupied the rest, in their own windows. the images resize great now, in particular. > > -Toke