From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (ie-in-x0233.1e100.net [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E005121F0BA for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:12:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k11so10128644iea.10 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:12:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b4+ov19rqV1ygzsl5fBRJt1dqrgG4qodQzO6AlRNfeM=; b=0TurpVCcujNZ8NDF42ZoNJ5uCcsbMsA6cMKQZZyfoLDvID/J37hpRi0kJoDcArydOk APO9YX/4PXJw0aUHGYdeaofR26ByzaG4eFZz350xKRd7maDEUGnRNy+hFLndt+sFduTy Jy+kKk+IgaMMJpesZEDnaFzPcj2ITeU8cdHSc9CphHydomdQvHVn0rUJ2A7pYLlinx16 BcSIN0mQVnLt9E3nV/bGN1zZWjMYvebwUVdYYXdRdVUSaCnMiK8bp022g5H4oD0vxEsC +ml9SYRlrE8KfT8wfjYK+CyyT2LKTry9Ti+3L5RluQRLQPles3nNOFxmYdsfM26qHfgw q8Sg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.56.139 with SMTP id a11mr11022352igq.86.1361376771699; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:12:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.77.1 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:12:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8948C7F6-3F35-46D5-9367-02B79553E409@gmail.com> References: <8948C7F6-3F35-46D5-9367-02B79553E409@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:12:51 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: William Katsak Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0401f449e1f28204d62a3a00 Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Switch Issue X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:12:53 -0000 --f46d0401f449e1f28204d62a3a00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I only recently tried to get vlans to work. I ran into major issues trying to get babel to work across them, am not sure if I was running into bugs in quagga or not and gave up (the symptom was that it didn't like having the same fe80 address on the same LAN despite being vlan'd. ) This obviously isn't your problem. I have not tried of late to jam jumbo packets through it, I have generally been concerned that bad things would happen if anyone tried. Aside from that, no clue. There are various means of monitoring the switch behavior including snmp stuff buried inside the switch (?) command. On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:01 AM, William Katsak wrote: > Hello, > > Just wanted to see if anyone has seen an issue like this: > > I have a 3800 running Sugarland at a remote site. It was running nice and > reliably, connected to the local network by a VLAN trunked connection (I > have interfaces for the default VLAN, and VLANS 100 and 200 passing > through). Last night it suddenly stopped working. There seems to be no da= ta > flowing through the switch at all, even though I can ssh to the router, > reboot, poke at it, etc. from over the Internet. > > I see no error messages regarding the switch in the logs or dmesg. Anyone > else see a 3800 switch crap out unceremoniously? > > Thanks, > Bill Katsak > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html --f46d0401f449e1f28204d62a3a00 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I only recently tried to get vlans to work. I ran into major issues trying = to get babel to work across them, am not sure if I was running into bugs in= quagga or not and gave up (the symptom was that it didn't like having = the same fe80 address on the same LAN despite being vlan'd. )

This obviously isn't your problem. I have not tried of l= ate to jam jumbo packets through it, I have generally been concerned that b= ad things would happen if anyone tried. Aside from that, no clue. There are= various means of monitoring the switch behavior including snmp stuff burie= d inside the switch (?) command.=A0

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:01 AM, William Ka= tsak <wkatsak@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

Just wanted to see if anyone has seen an issue like this:

I have a 3800 running Sugarland at a remote site. It was running nice and r= eliably, connected to the local network by a VLAN trunked connection (I hav= e interfaces for the default VLAN, and VLANS 100 and 200 passing through). = Last night it suddenly stopped working. There seems to be no data flowing t= hrough the switch at all, even though I can ssh to the router, reboot, poke= at it, etc. from over the Internet.

I see no error messages regarding the switch in the logs or dmesg. Anyone e= lse see a 3800 switch crap out unceremoniously?

Thanks,
Bill Katsak



_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel



--
Dave T=E4ht<= br>
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/s= ubscribe.html=20
--f46d0401f449e1f28204d62a3a00--