From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com (mail-oi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA4EE3B25E for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 20:53:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id u201so166129038oie.0 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:53:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aTmOj89FhLirbXb5ZsX9/m6uH2NPwOpQPfkntn95rRo=; b=fpgtFF1xQUmqfcxNdm3ggGcUgQHQuCo/N/ufrZcc/6AosDA1eDIYk5qAjntP+I0Vx5 L+kmYeUj9zxgTTpV/CLOILql96O3VKqgJdO4yMU/EIoffK8T4C39Q1Qse0kDx4ItCXGh Aavk8bedGUtAD3mvr7G6cn5gomWUVTZh8kTwT8pT/hzo4oDlG8j1iRDqVMpP0BGgEVVO 9XvLgteCqRmrglCuEQpVihlbTrmKDtUBsmYXRLrFqFsHiWinH49TgUxTF37SwRDrO2si Lz4Bs/HmUeY8WmkdzTo5GU5ofv1vkrAp+iUdSVW5yz3VDhWI3DQN79d9TBB4eqVE2o7o 8Dbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aTmOj89FhLirbXb5ZsX9/m6uH2NPwOpQPfkntn95rRo=; b=V0IwDQ1Hr6DOuZnd5+74Zz7qMMEd1z4rIDPNqOa+srAwx6lvQYvrIiavBTgvWlMWk7 BsMvyFBSK1eUL2JSQiW7aYr///yDW7vfkNPz6/Uej1YIhKfO84xoMt5r+JjQYKWwFC/x x6jlqRytwwygkaTk+2lRIKh2EojuHxNUwOWZmWMUUqLpU+2iqliJv5lBIsqD2IOLvnAv BKTspdsWkQFaQa0oMK584uTjmdkZfzpGnAQn5ehWufBLlL4tqhpSdaO3VeVpC8PMN4Pv zz92Sfl3C5sELSlbVG+ovy4LtDy8Qm9iIqzIW5LFskPrH7Ki4oQtanJIzybZNo2F54lb wyxA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLzERyuJTDmoC1gYsuH1C5Jxv1PAgH1ItepS22kIzhSkRjNFUnpcTPEnlytswC4py+4tjL9Hmi8BnXwzw== X-Received: by 10.157.26.87 with SMTP id u23mr4690753otu.169.1466297624233; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:53:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.175.130 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:53:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Dave Taht Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:53:43 -0700 Message-ID: To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] qos calculator & paper for htb rate selection X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 00:53:44 -0000 I do keep hoping that one day we'll just be able to plug values into an equation and come up with the right "thing". Anyway, this paper had some pretty graphs and some severe flaws - like only using long flows, not emulating longer RTTs, nor experimenting with speeds greater than 40mbit. Some of the results, I think, hold, but I'd have to think about it. I was attracted to reading it because it attempted to take our "85%" rule for sqm-scripts on downloads and attach some science to it... http://sci-hub.bz/10.1109/TNET.2014.2366496 --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! http://blog.cerowrt.org