From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E719A21F1A0 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i138so3625057oig.16 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:42:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=X6uj4WVirPpV62WyxlZk+pxq8etJqlDcmQdBQkTAupI=; b=RqKPeIPMVlm7PiMGqK82WXnHnuQUp9dSYV/6M/3o26khVoxs82fsK6Fz4e4xK1sGVN RA44CugkI/q9+107EoLwKWpCOBytnlfTeII7lgcbNzUFQQmWc8d4SRuVg91e/jULDqZ2 wynJeuGFFfrJ0fQaHCaw5FSxPOGkRUxhIcFTV6YmpVZaZrvCO9a2myjKzmLkMk0IhJ9r v1J0DbGr/AWHtarqeGCwThVIpWztF4wKOzAVknQaMjaXuntsqS4+XrP2bIGwCzB1/IOb Rx6sxpW159zk2o0WRzrFHU7ehhcMA+6BJ7y25qPHbyAr1+n/ILJe34CXnX0RpBHa7gJ4 MH7g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.129.230 with SMTP id nz6mr35306575obb.16.1410871319557; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.227.76 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:41:59 +0300 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Michael Richardson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.50-1 report X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:42:30 -0000 On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Michael Richardson wrot= e: > > Awhile ago I reported problems where my pppoe link did not come up, and > sometimes not all of the wifi interfaces would come up. It seemed like i= t > was some kind of limit on number of interfaces, and started looking at ne= tifd > for some clue what was going on, but I didn't see any obvious struct > interface[16] or some such. > > Last night, after my wife complained again, I rebooted the 3800 after 60 = days > of uptime... I've kind of lost track, has it been that long since 3.10.50-1? > I had placed numifX=3D0 somewhere so that I wouldn't instantiate 8 > useless interfaces. Having done that, I notice that my two guest wifi > interfaces got brought up properly, and the PPPoE link came up on it's > own (I think, I do have some hacks to force it up). I still had to poke > some things. > In conversations at IETF90, I think someone said that netifd does somethi= ng > like: > (1 << ifindex) > in order to mark something about interfaces... That would certainly expl= ain > the problem, because ifindex can march upwards quite easily on systems wi= th > PPP interfaces coming/going. I note that on my freshly booted system, > all ifindex are < 32. Hmm. > > I haven't located any code in netifd that does this, but haven't looked > that much yet. > > What is the plan now that BB is about to be fully released? I think that= all > CeroWRT code for the 3800 is now upstream.... it seems that the next Cero= WRT > release should simply point at openwrt BB? I have to admit that after bug 442 seemed fixed, I put cerowrt down and focused on A) catching up on sleep, B) fixing some sorely busted infrastructure, and C) getting in some paid work (to make up for the extra year spent on cero) and D) find ways to get more solid funding overall, specifically for making wifi fast and E) catching up on sleep. I have now built cero not once for over 45 days, and have actually been to a few social events, and other "normal" things. I have, in fact, taken off several weekends in a row, for the first time in 3 years. Last week featured my first stage appearance in years at the sffringe festival, in fact. I'd dearly like SQM to make BB, but that requires some focused effort that I don't have in me yet. Yes, my plan is to rebase on BB once frozen, and do stable updates. At the moment, however, only trivial bugs in cero remain in the 3.10.50-1 build and I, at least, can live with them a while longer. Whether or not we continue onwards to track homenet, adopt new hardware, or do anything else with this project is up to y'all, and to funding. I'd really like to hand off the build engineering process to someone else, and be able to work more closely with the wifi stack instead, in particular. Where would you like it to go? > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh netwo= rks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network archite= ct [ > ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails= [ > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/make-wifi-fast